Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the influence of the shell angle of cervical artificial disc on long-term effectiveness of cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR). Methods:The clinical data of 71 patients who were treated with single-level CADR with Bryan prosthesis between December 2003 and December 2007 and followed up more than 10 years, were retrospectively analyzed. There were 44 males and 27 females with an age of 26-69 years (mean, 45.9 years). According to the shell angle of the cervical artificial disc which was measured on the postoperative lateral X-ray film, the patients were divided into kyphotic group (shell angle was negative) and non-kyphotic group. The following evaluation indexes before operation and at last follow-up were compared between 2 groups. Radiographic indexes included the range of motion (ROM) of cervical spine, the ROM of operated level, Cobb angle of operated level (the negative value indicated that the segmental kyphosis occurred at operated level), paravertebral ossification (PO) grades (grades 3 and 4 were high grade PO). Clinical indexes included Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and overall effectiveness evaluation (Odom criteria). Results:There were 24 patients in kyphotic group and 47 patients in non-kyphotic group. There was no significant difference in baseline data including gender, age, and operated level between 2 groups ( P>0.05). All the patients in 2 groups were followed up 121-165 months (mean, 128 months). There was no significant difference in preoperative ROM of cervical spine and ROM of operated level between 2 groups ( P>0.05); but the preoperative Cobb angle of operated level in kyphosis group was significantly lower than that in non-kyphotic group ( t=2.636, P=0.013). There was no significant difference in ROM of cervical spine at last follow-up between 2 groups ( t=1.393, P=0.168), however, the ROM and the Cobb angle of operated level in kyphotic group were significantly lower than those in non-kyphotic group ( P<0.05). According to the Cobb angle of operated level at last follow-up, there were 9 patients (37.5%) with segmental kyphosis in kyphotic group and 7 patients (14.9%) in non-kyphotic group, showing significant difference ( χ2=4.651, P=0.031). There was a significant difference in PO grades between 2 groups ( Z=2.894, P=0.004) at last follow-up. In kyphotic group, there were 10 patients (41.7%) with low grade PO and 14 patients (58.3%) with high grade PO; and in non-kyphosis group, there were 36 patients (76.6%) with low grade PO and 11 patients (23.4%) with high grade PO. There was no significant difference in JOA scores and NDI before operation and at last follow-up, and the JOA improvement rate, NDI decline, and Odom criteria score at last follow-up between 2 groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:The shell angle of cervical artificial disc may lead to a decrease in the postoperative segmental ROM, and an increased occurrence of segmental kyphosis and high incidence of PO.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in the Patients with Preoperative Reversible Kyphosis: A Matched Cohort Study

[Use Sagittal Reconstruction CT for Making Decisions Regarding the Surgical Strategy for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament].

Are Patients With Segmental Cervical Kyphosis Appropriate Candidates for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA)? A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis Compared to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF)

[Analysis of Influence of Shell Angle of Cervical Artificial Disc on Long-Term Effectiveness of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement].

Radiological Changes in Adjacent and Index Levels after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

Cervical alignment and clinical outcome of anterior decompression with fusion vs. posterior decompression with fixation in kyphotic cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Cervical alignment and range of motion after single-level ProDisc-C replacement

Radiological and clinical outcomes of 3-level cervical disc arthroplasty

Does Focal Kyphotic Deformity at Non‐responsible Levels Affect the Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion?

Sagittal alignment comparison of Bryan disc arthroplasty with ProDisc-C arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial.

Sagittal Alignment Comparison of Bryan Disc Arthroplasty with ProDisc-C Arthroplasty

Predicting surgical outcome and sagittal alignment change in patients with cervical spondylosis and degenerative kyphosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Is Complete Correction of Cervical Sagittal Malalignment Necessary During 4-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery in Patients with Kyphosis?

Initial exploration of clinical outcomes of consecutive two-level cervical artificial disc replacement

Influence of the deviated center of rotation on the range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty –an in vivo study with a minimum of 10-year follow-up

Exploration on Sagittal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes after Consecutive Three-Level Hybrid Surgery and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: a Minimum of a 5-Year Follow-Up.

Cervical Spine Balance of Multilevel Total Disc Replacement, Hybrid Surgery, and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With A Long-term Follow-up

Cervical Spine Alignment and Clinical Outcomes after Multilevel Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion with or Without Plate A Minimal 5-Year Follow-Up of a CONSORT-compliant Article

Comparison of 2 Zero-Profile Implants in the Treatment of Single-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Preliminary Clinical Study of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Fusion.

Med-and long-term clinical results of cervical artificial disc replacement with different image diagnosis and symptom diagnosis

Clinical and Radiologic Features of 3 Reconstructive Procedures for the Surgical Management of Patients with Bilevel Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease at a Minimum Follow-Up Period of 5 Years: A Comparative Study