Abstract:Global gridded crop models (GGCMs) combine agronomic or plant growth models with gridded spatial input data to estimate spatially explicit crop yields and agricultural externalities at the global scale. Differences in GGCM outputs arise from the use of different biophysical models, setups, and input data. GGCM ensembles are frequently employed to bracket uncertainties in impact studies without investigating the causes of divergence in outputs. This study explores differences in maize yield estimates from five GGCMs based on the public domain field-scale model Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) that participate in the AgMIP Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison initiative. Albeit using the same crop model, the GGCMs differ in model version, input data, management assumptions, parameterization, and selection of subroutines affecting crop yield estimates via cultivar distributions, soil attributes, and hydrology among others. The analyses reveal inter-annual yield variability and absolute yield levels in the EPIC-based GGCMs to be highly sensitive to soil parameterization and crop management. All GGCMs show an intermediate performance in reproducing reported yields with a higher skill if a static soil profile is assumed or sufficient plant nutrients are supplied. An in-depth comparison of setup domains for two EPIC-based GGCMs shows that GGCM performance and plant stress responses depend substantially on soil parameters and soil process parameterization, i.e. hydrology and nutrient turnover, indicating that these often neglected domains deserve more scrutiny. For agricultural impact assessments, employing a GGCM ensemble with its widely varying assumptions in setups appears the best solution for coping with uncertainties from lack of comprehensive global data on crop management, cultivar distributions and coefficients for agro-environmental processes. However, the underlying assumptions require systematic specifications to cover representative agricultural systems and environmental conditions. Furthermore, the interlinkage of parameter sensitivity from various domains such as soil parameters, nutrient turnover coefficients, and cultivar specifications highlights that global sensitivity analyses and calibration need to be performed in an integrated manner to avoid bias resulting from disregarded core model domains. Finally, relating evaluations of the EPIC-based GGCMs to a wider ensemble based on individual core models shows that structural differences outweigh in general differences in configurations of GGCMs based on the same model, and that the ensemble mean gains higher skill from the inclusion of structurally different GGCMs. Although the members of the wider ensemble herein do not consider crop-soil-management interactions, their sensitivity to nutrient supply indicates that findings for the EPIC-based sub-ensemble will likely become relevant for other GGCMs with the progressing inclusion of such processes.

Uncertainties in Simulating N Uptake, Net N Mineralization, Soil Mineral N and N Leaching in European Crop Rotations Using Process-Based Models

Simulating the Net Ecosystem CO2 Exchange and Its Components over Winter Wheat Cultivation Sites Across a Large Climate Gradient in Europe Using the ORCHIDEE-STICS Generic Model

Yields and Nitrogen Dynamics in Ley-Arable Systems—Comparing Different Approaches in the APSIM Model

The Performance of the EU-Rotate_N Model in Predicting the Growth and Nitrogen Uptake of Rotations of Field Vegetable Crops in a Mediterranean Environment

The Carbon Balance of European Croplands: A Cross-Site Comparison of Simulation Models

Crop Model Improvement Reduces the Uncertainty of the Response to Temperature of Multi-Model Ensembles

Uncertainties in global crop model frameworks: effects of cultivar distribution, crop management and soil handling on crop yield estimates

Global Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of the Dynamic Simulation of Crop N Uptake by Using Various N Dilution Curve Approaches

Development and critical evaluation of a generic 2-D agro-hydrological model (SMCR_N) for the responses of crop yield and nitrogen composition to nitrogen fertilizer

Parameterization-induced uncertainties and impacts of crop management harmonization in a global gridded crop model ensemble

Understanding soil nitrogen processes in diversified vegetable systems through agroecosystem modelling

Importance of crop varieties and management practices: evaluation of a process-based model for simulating CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O fluxes at five European maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) sites

Tracking nitrogen losses in a greenhouse crop rotation experiment in North China using the EU-Rotate_N simulation model.

Importance of Crop Varieties and Management Practices: Evaluation of A Process-Based Model for Simulating Co2 and H2o Fluxes at Five European Maize (zea Mays L.) Sites

Long-term modelling of soil N mineralization and N fate using STICS in a 34-year crop rotation experiment

Simulation of Winter Wheat Response to Variable Sowing Dates and Densities in a High-Yielding Environment

Evaluation of Four Modelling Approaches to Estimate Nitrous Oxide Emissions in China's Cropland.

Modeling Long-Term Corn Yield Response to Nitrogen Rate and Crop Rotation

Assimilating Sentinel-2 data in a modified vegetation photosynthesis and respiration model (VPRM) to improve the simulation of croplands CO 2 fluxes in Europe

Uncertainties of Modeling Gross Primary Productivity over Europe: A Systematic Study on the Effects of Using Different Drivers and Terrestrial Biosphere Models

How Well Can APSIM Simulate Nitrogen Uptake and Nitrogen Fixation of Legume Crops?