Abstract:Highlights • The component uncertainty integrated importance measure is proposed considering multiple epistemic uncertainties. • The component degradation process is constructed by Markov process model with interval values for failure rates. • The multi-state system reliability model is developed under Markov hierarchal evidential network considering the characteristics of hierarchy, dependency, randomness, and uncertainty. • Other importance measures proposed in previous studies are extended under Markov hierarchal evidential network framework. Relationships among different important measures are discussed. • A case study on the displacement compensation hydraulic system is conducted to demonstrate the use of proposed importance measures. Importance measures can be used to identify the vulnerable components in an aviation system at the early design stage. However, due to lack of knowledge or less available information on the component or system, the epistemic uncertainties may be one of the challenging issues in importance evaluation. In addition, the properties of the aircraft system, which are the fundamentals of the component importance measure, including the hierarchy, dependency, randomness, and uncertainty, should be taken into consideration. To solve these problems, this paper proposes the component Uncertainty Integrated Importance Measure (component UIIM) which considers multiple epistemic uncertainties in the complex multi-state systems. The degradation process for the components is described by a Markov model, and the system reliability model is developed using the Markov hierarchal evidential network. The concept of integrated importance measure is then extended into component UIIM to evaluate the component criticality rather than the component state change criticality, from the perspective of system performance. A case study on displacement compensation hydraulic system is presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed uncertainty importance measure. The results show that the component UIIM can be an effective method for evaluating the component criticality from system performance perspective at the system early design.

Computational Method for Importance Measure of the K-out-of-n System Based on Stress–strength Interference

Dynamic importance measure for the K-out-of-n: G system under repeated random load

Importance measure for K-out-of-n: G systems under dynamic random load considering strength degradation

Recent advances in system reliability optimization driven by importance measures

Reliability of dynamic k-out-of-n systems with coupling components in power transmission systems

A Framework for Reliability Approximation of Multi-State Weighted K -out-of- N Systems.

Component uncertainty importance measure in complex multi-state system considering epistemic uncertainties

Reliability inference of stress-strength for a K-out-of-N: G mixed standby system with switching failure

Importance Measures for Critical Components in Complex System Based on Copula Hierarchical Bayesian Network

Reliability Allocation Based On Importance Measures

Optimal Design of Binary Weighted K-Out-Of-N Systems

Definitions of Generalized Multi-Performance Weighted Multi-State K¯-out-of-n System and Its Reliability Evaluations

Compositional Performance Evaluation with Importance Measures

A NEW METHOD FOR ANALYZING IMPORTANCE MEASURE OF BASIC VARIABLE EFFECT ON FAILURE PROBABILITY

Time-dependent reliability of (weighted) k -out-of- n systems with identical component deterioration

Dynamic reliability measures of weighted k-out-of-n system with heterogeneous components and its application to solar power generating system

On reliability assessment of weighted k-out-of-n systems with multiple types of components

Performance Degradation Based on Importance Change and Application in Dissimilar Redundancy Actuation System

Importance measure construction and solving algorithm oriented to the cost-constrained reliability optimization model

Reliability analysis for k -out-of- n (G) systems subject to dependent competing failure processes