Comparative osteology of the hynobiid complex<i>Liua</i>-<i>Protohynobius</i>-<i>Pseudohynobius</i>(Amphibia, Urodela): ROMAN NUMERAL ONE. Cranial anatomy of<i>Pseudohynobius</i>

Jia Jia,Ke-Qin Gao,Jian-ping Jiang,Gabriel S. Bever,Rongchuan Xiong,Gang Wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13311
2021-01-01
Journal of Anatomy
Abstract:Hynobiidae are a clade of salamanders that diverged early within the crown radiation and that retain a considerable number of features plesiomorphic for the group. Their evolutionary history is informed by a fossil record that extends to the Middle Jurassic Bathonian time. Our understanding of the evolution within the total group of Hynobiidae has benefited considerably from recent discoveries of stem hynobiids but is constrained by inadequate anatomical knowledge of some extant forms.Pseudohynobiusis a derived hynobiid clade consisting of five to seven extant species living endemic to southwestern China. Although this clade has been recognized for over 37 years, osteological details of these extant hynobiids remain elusive, which undoubtedly has contributed to taxonomic controversies over the hynobiid complexLiua-Protohynobius-Pseudohynobius. Here we provide a bone-by-bone study of the cranium in the five extant species ofPseudohynobius(Ps. flavomaculatus,Ps. guizhouensis,Ps. jinfo,Ps. kuankuoshuiensisandPs. shuichengensis) based on x-ray computer tomography data for 18 specimens. Our results indicate that the cranium in each of these species has a combination of differences in morphology, proportions and articulation patterns in both dermal and endochondral bones. Our study establishes a range of intraspecific differences that will serve as organizing hypotheses for future studies as more extensive collections of these species become available. Morphological features in the cranium for terrestrial ecological adaptation in Hynobiidae are summarized. Based on the results, we also discuss the evolution and development of several potential synapomorphies of Hynobiidae, including features of the orbitosphenoid and articular.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?