Plant-soil feedback as a pathway of invasional meltdown

Zhijie Zhang,Yanjie Liu,Caroline Brunel,Mark van Kleunen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.11.987867
2020-01-01
Abstract:Invasive alien species are frequently assumed to be more competitive than natives. Hundreds of experiments have investigated this using pairs of species. However, species compete in highly diverse communities, and it remains unknown whether invasive aliens are more competitive than natives in multispecies communities. We tested whether and how a third plant species affects the competition between alien and native plants through plant-soil feedback. We first conditioned soil with one of ten species (six natives and four aliens) or without plants. Then, we grew on these 11 soils, five aliens and five natives without competition, and with intra- or interspecific competition (all pairwise alien-native combinations). Overall, aliens were not more competitive than natives when grown on soil conditioned by other natives or on non-conditioned soil. However, aliens were more competitive than natives on soil conditioned by other aliens. Soil conditioned by aliens changed the competitive outcomes by affecting intrinsic growth rates (i.e. growth rates without competition) of aliens less negatively than that of natives, rather than by affecting the strength of competition. Rhizosphere-microbiome analysis indicated that the less negative effect of aliens on other aliens is mediated by fungal endophytes. The dissimilarity of fungal endophyte communities, which positively correlated with strength of plant-soil feedback, was higher between two aliens than between aliens and natives. Our study suggests that coexistence between alien and native plants might be less likely with more aliens. Such invasional meltdown through plant-soil feedback is most likely mediated by spill-over of fungal endophytes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?