‘Am I really the priority here?’: help-seeking experiences of university students who self-harmed

Tickell Alice,Fonagy Peter,Hajdú Katalin,Obradović Sandra,Pilling Stephen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.652

2024-02-01

BJPsych Open

Abstract:Background Self-harm is a significant problem in university students because of its association with emotional distress, physical harm, broader mental health issues and potential suicidality. Research suggests that fewer than half of students who have self-harmed seek professional help when at university. Aims This study aimed to explore the help-seeking journeys of university students who had engaged in self-harm, to identify perceived facilitators and barriers to securing both formal and informal support. Method Participants comprised 12 students who had self-harmed during their university tenure. Engaging in two semi-structured interviews over the academic year, they shared insights into their help-seeking behaviours and proposed enhancements to local services. Data underwent reflexive thematic analysis within a critical realist framework. Results The analysis identified four themes: ‘The initial university phase poses the greatest challenge’, ‘Perceived criteria for “valid” mental health problems’, ‘Evading external judgements, concerns and consequences’ and ‘The pivotal role of treatment options and flexibility in recovery’. Conclusions Students felt isolated and misunderstood, which amplified self-harming tendencies and diminished inclinations for help-seeking. A prevalent belief was that for self-harm to be deemed ‘valid’, it must manifest with a certain severity; however, concurrent fears existed around the ramifications of perceived excessive severity. Participants expressed a desire for streamlined pathways to mental health resources, encompassing both university and external mental health services. Insights from this study could guide future research and inform current service paradigms within academic and healthcare systems.

psychiatry

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The Problem the Paper Aims to Address

This paper aims to explore the help-seeking experiences of students who self-harm during their university years, in order to identify the perceived facilitators and barriers they encounter when seeking formal and informal support. Specifically, the study focuses on the following points:

1. **Understanding students' help-seeking journey during university**: The study uses in-depth interviews to understand how these students seek help when experiencing psychological distress and self-harm.
2. **Identifying facilitators and barriers in the help-seeking process**: It explores the personal and social obstacles students face when seeking help, as well as the factors that promote their active pursuit of support.
3. **Proposing recommendations for improving services**: Based on student feedback, the study suggests ways to improve existing mental health services to better meet the needs of these students.

### Background

Self-harm is a serious issue among university students as it is associated with emotional distress, physical injury, broader mental health problems, and potential suicidal behavior. Research indicates that less than half of the students who self-harm seek professional help during their university years. Therefore, understanding these students' help-seeking experiences is crucial for improving mental health support systems.

### Methods

The study selected 12 students who had self-harmed during their university years and conducted two semi-structured interviews (each lasting about 1.5 hours) to gather insights into their help-seeking behaviors and suggestions for improving local services. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis within a critical realist framework.

### Results

The analysis identified four themes:

1. **The early stages of university are the most challenging**: Many students felt lonely and socially isolated during the early stages of university, which exacerbated their tendency to self-harm.
2. **Perceived criteria for 'valid' mental health issues**: Some students believed that self-harm had to reach a certain level of severity to be considered a 'valid' mental health issue.
3. **Avoiding external judgment, concern, and consequences**: Students selectively shared information about their self-harm to reduce discrimination from others and maintain autonomy over their actions.
4. **The critical role of treatment options and flexibility in recovery**: Students wanted their needs and preferences to be prioritized in mental health treatment decisions, and for the treatment methods to be flexible.

### Conclusion

Students felt isolated and misunderstood, which exacerbated their tendency to self-harm and reduced their willingness to seek help. They generally believed that self-harm had to reach a certain level of severity to be considered 'valid,' but were also concerned about overly severe consequences. Participants desired more streamlined access to mental health resources, including services both within and outside the university. These insights can guide future research and inform existing service models within academic and healthcare systems.