Abstract:Background: Despite ongoing debates, there is still no consensus regarding where to divide the inferior mesenteric artery for oncological reasons in rectal cancer: at its origin from the aorta (high ligation) or distal to the origin of the left colic artery (low ligation). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer surgery. Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ISRCTN Register were searched. Study selection: andomized controlled trials investigating outcomes of curative anterior resection in patients with cancer of the rectum were included. Interventions: High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery was compared with low ligation technique. Main outcome measures: We measured the total number of lymph nodes harvested, anastomotic leak, postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion to open surgery, overall survival, and disease-free survival. Results: Analysis of 1102 patients from 8 trials suggested no difference between high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in terms of total number of lymph nodes harvested (mean difference = -0.87; p = 0.26), anastomotic leak (OR = 1.39; p = 0.15), postoperative complications (OR = 1.39; p = 0.78), postoperative mortality (risk difference = -0.00; p = 0.48), operative time (mean difference = -1.99; p = 0.79), intraoperative blood loss (mean difference = -2.28; p = 0.77), conversion to open surgery (risk difference = 0.01; p = 0.48), 5-year overall survival (OR = 0.76; p = 0.32), 5-year disease-free survival (OR = 0.88; p = 0.58), overall survival at maximum follow up (OR = 0.80; p = 0.43), and disease-free survival at maximum follow-up (OR = 0.83; p = 0.35). Limitations: Limited data were available on functional and long-term survival outcomes. Conclusions: There is no difference between high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in terms of oncological outcomes or postoperative morbidity and mortality. The available evidence is subject to potential confounding by the use of neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy, disease stage, location of tumor, and use of protective stoma. Functional outcomes including postoperative bowel, urinary and sexual function, and long-term survival outcomes should be the outcome of study in future trials. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019148626.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Rectal Cancer Patients with High or Improved Low Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery.

High ligation versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective study on surgical and long-term outcome

High and low inferior mesenteric artery ligation in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resections: A retrospective study

High versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A prospective study of surgical and oncological outcomes

High ligation versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery and lymph node dissection in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery

High Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery During Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery Increases the Risk of Anastomotic Leakage: a Meta-Analysis

Oncological Impact of the Level of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation in Low Rectal Cancer Surgery

Inferior mesenteric artery ligation level in rectal cancer surgery: still no answer-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Long-term clinical outcomes after high and low ligations with lymph node dissection around the root of the inferior mesenteric artery in patients with rectal cancer

Low ligation has a lower anastomotic leakage rate after rectal cancer surgery

The long-term survival benefits of high and low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: A review and meta-analysis.

Influence of Different Treatment Methods of Left Colic Artery on Postoperative Rehabilitation of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer

Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing High and Low Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Rectal Cancer Surgery

The Long-Term Survival Benefits of High and Low Ligation of Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Colorectal Cancer Surgery

[Preservation of Left Colic Artery in Laparoscopic Radical Operation for Rectal Cancer].

[Role of Different Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Sigmoid Colon or Rectal Cancer Surgery: a Meta-Analysis].

Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis

The effect of different inferior mesenteric artery ligation levels and different lymph node dissection areas on the short- and long-term outcomes of rectal cancer

Level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation in sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery: analysis of apical lymph node metastasis and recurrence

Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of three different types of inferior mesenteric artery ligation in left colonic and rectal cancers: a network meta-analysis

Lymphadenectomy Around Inferior Mesenteric Artery In Low-Tie Vs High-Tie Laparoscopic Anterior Resection: Short- And Long-Term Outcome Of A Cohort Of 614 Rectal Cancers