Abstract:We read with interest the article by Ye and colleagues [1Ye B. Cheng M. Li W. et al.Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in clinical stage Ia lung adenocarcinoma.Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 98: 217-223Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (74) Google Scholar] about the predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma, in which they reported a 10.6% overall rate of lymph node metastasis.Theoretically, candidates for sublobar resection should be node negative; thus, it is important to improve the accuracy of clinical staging for cancer. According to the data of Ye and colleagues, factors such as ground-glass opacity status, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, histologic subtype, and maximum standardized uptake value have potential for the prediction of lymph node metastasis. A prediction model based on some of these factors has been established to assess the possibility of lymph node metastasis in early-stage lung cancer [2Zhang Y. Sun Y. Xiang J. Hu H. Chen H. A prediction model for n2 disease in T1 non-small cell lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 144: 1360-1364Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar]. Some issues are worth noting here. First, the specific histology subtype (eg, acinar predominant, micropapillary predominant) was a reliable predictive factor both in the study of Ye and colleagues and in other research [3Zhang Y. Sun Y. Shen L. et al.Predictive factors of lymph node status in small peripheral non-small cell lung cancers: tumor histology is more reliable.Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20: 1949-1954Crossref PubMed Scopus (47) Google Scholar]. However, for the majority of lung cancer patients, the histology subtype is a postoperative pathologic diagnosis that is difficult to determine before operation because of the lack of a sufficient tumor specimen, so the histology subtype is of limited value for excluding node-positive patients preoperatively. Second, according to their univariate analyses, the node metastasis rates for patients with individual risk factors were less than 20%, suggesting that these predictive factors are insufficiently efficient for excluding node-positive patients.Two approaches have potential value in selecting candidates for sublobar resection. One is to identify high-risk patients for lymph node metastasis, followed by mediastinal staging evaluation. The other is the use of lymphatic tracers for sentinel lymph node mapping. A clinical study has demonstrated that an indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system is feasible for use in sentinel node biopsy and has a high overall accuracy rate of 80.7% [4Yamashita S. Tokuishi K. Anami K. et al.Video-assisted thoracoscopic indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system shows sentinel lymph nodes in non-small-cell lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 141: 141-144Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar]. Optimization of the imaging system and lymphatic tracers for the sentinel lymph nodes would provide an accurate means of determining the optimal candidates for sublobar resection. We eagerly await the further development and refinement of this technology.Again, we congratulate Ye and colleagues on this brilliant study. We are confident that this study will optimize the selection of candidates for either invasive mediastinal staging or sublobar resection. We read with interest the article by Ye and colleagues [1Ye B. Cheng M. Li W. et al.Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in clinical stage Ia lung adenocarcinoma.Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 98: 217-223Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (74) Google Scholar] about the predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma, in which they reported a 10.6% overall rate of lymph node metastasis. Theoretically, candidates for sublobar resection should be node negative; thus, it is important to improve the accuracy of clinical staging for cancer. According to the data of Ye and colleagues, factors such as ground-glass opacity status, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, histologic subtype, and maximum standardized uptake value have potential for the prediction of lymph node metastasis. A prediction model based on some of these factors has been established to assess the possibility of lymph node metastasis in early-stage lung cancer [2Zhang Y. Sun Y. Xiang J. Hu H. Chen H. A prediction model for n2 disease in T1 non-small cell lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 144: 1360-1364Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar]. Some issues are worth noting here. First, the specific histology subtype (eg, acinar predominant, micropapillary predominant) was a reliable predictive factor both in the study of Ye and colleagues and in other research [3Zhang Y. Sun Y. Shen L. et al.Predictive factors of lymph node status in small peripheral non-small cell lung cancers: tumor histology is more reliable.Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20: 1949-1954Crossref PubMed Scopus (47) Google Scholar]. However, for the majority of lung cancer patients, the histology subtype is a postoperative pathologic diagnosis that is difficult to determine before operation because of the lack of a sufficient tumor specimen, so the histology subtype is of limited value for excluding node-positive patients preoperatively. Second, according to their univariate analyses, the node metastasis rates for patients with individual risk factors were less than 20%, suggesting that these predictive factors are insufficiently efficient for excluding node-positive patients. Two approaches have potential value in selecting candidates for sublobar resection. One is to identify high-risk patients for lymph node metastasis, followed by mediastinal staging evaluation. The other is the use of lymphatic tracers for sentinel lymph node mapping. A clinical study has demonstrated that an indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system is feasible for use in sentinel node biopsy and has a high overall accuracy rate of 80.7% [4Yamashita S. Tokuishi K. Anami K. et al.Video-assisted thoracoscopic indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system shows sentinel lymph nodes in non-small-cell lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 141: 141-144Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar]. Optimization of the imaging system and lymphatic tracers for the sentinel lymph nodes would provide an accurate means of determining the optimal candidates for sublobar resection. We eagerly await the further development and refinement of this technology. Again, we congratulate Ye and colleagues on this brilliant study. We are confident that this study will optimize the selection of candidates for either invasive mediastinal staging or sublobar resection. Predictive Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Clinical Stage IA Lung AdenocarcinomaThe Annals of Thoracic SurgeryVol. 98Issue 1PreviewSystematic lymph node dissection or sampling in all patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma is currently controversial because the risk of lymph node metastasis is unclear. This study aimed to determine the predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Full-Text PDF

Risk Factors of Lobar Lymph Node Metastases in Non-Primary Tumor-Bearing Lobes among the Patients of Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer.

Distribution and prognosis of mediastinal lymph node metastases of nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients Without Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Neoadjuvant Therapy: Analysis of SEER Data.

Risk Analyses of N2 Lymph-Node Metastases in Patients with T1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Multi-Center Real-World Observational Study in China

High Risk For Non-Sentinel Node Metastasis In Breast Cancer Patients With Sentinel Node Metastases

The pattern of lymph node metastasis in peripheral pulmonary nodules patients and risk prediction models

Predictive Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Small Size Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Prognostic Impact of Lymphadenectomy on Outcomes of Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Non–small Cell Lung Cancer ≤2 Cm

Risk Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Non‐small Cell Lung Cancer ≤ 2 Cm in Size: A Monocentric Population‐based Analysis

Is Lobe Specific Lymph Node Dissection Adequate for Cn0–1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?

Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Possible Selective Lymph Node Dissection in Clinical Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lymph node metastasis in Chinese patients with clinical T1 non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter real-world observational study.

Effectiveness and Safety of Systematic and Selective Lymphadenectomies in Chinese Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Received Sublobar Resection.

A Real-World Observational Study To Explore Clinical Characteristics Of Chinese Patients With T1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Complicated With Lymph Metastases.

Clinical Significance And Role Of Lymphatic Vessel Invasion As A Major Prognostic Implication In Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Optimal Lung Cancer Candidates for Sublobar Resection: Prediction of Pathologic Node-Negative Clinical Stage IA NSCLC.

Investigation To Metastasis Of Regional Lymph Node Station And Prediction To Long-Term Survival Following Esophagectomy In Thoracic Esophageal Cancer With Stage T1 To T3.

Risk factors for local recurrence after lobectomy and lymph node dissection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Implications for adjuvant therapy

Risk Factors for Occult Nodal Metastasis in Patients with Stage ⅠA Peripheral Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Mediastinal lymph-nodes metastasis beyond the lobe-specific: an independent risk factor toward worse prognoses.

Risk factors of N1 lymph node metastasis in clinical stage Ⅰ non-small cell lung cancer