Abstract:Background: The choice of carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS), as surgical and interventional treatment of atherosclerotic carotid stenosis, respectively, has been controversial in decades, especially for asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis. Age and the diameter of impaired carotid artery might be 2 important factors to decide whether CEA or CAS should be performed. Besides, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been confirmed as an effective method to predict the risk of stroke by classifying the carotid plaque into 4 grades. The role of CEUS in the choice of CEA or CAS still remains unclear. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 38 patients who underwent CEA with primary closure and 36 patients who underwent CAS in our hospital from October 2008 to January 2013 is conducted. Preoperative CEUS was performed to all patients, and data were collected and analyzed. All CEAs were performed with transverse incision. Results: The hospital stay was longer for the endarterectomy group than the stenting group (15.39 versus 10.91 d, P < 0.001), with an approximately two-third reduction of hospital costs ((sic)23686.21 versus (sic)60855.34, P < 0.001). The overall incidence of perioperative complications in the endarterectomy group was 7.9%, with no statistically significant difference in the group with internal carotid artery greater than or equal to 5 mm and in the group with internal carotid artery less than 5 mm (9.1% versus 6.3%, P = 0.75). No restenosis occurred in either of the subgroups during the follow-up. In patients older than 70 years, the perioperative complications were 0% in CEA and 10.53% in CAS (P = 0.42); the long-term restenosis was 0% in CEA and 5.26% in CAS (P = 0.67). In patients younger than 70 years, the perioperative complications were 11.5% in CEA and 23.53% in CAS (P = 0.31); the long-term restenosis was 0% in CEA and 0% in CAS (P > 0.01). For patients with grade 4 plaque in CEUS, the incidence of adverse events in the CAS group was significantly higher than that in the CEA group (7.14% versus 55.56%, P < 0.05). Conclusions: There were no significant differences in perioperative complications or restenosis rate between the CAS group and the CEA group in this study. Neither the diameter of impaired carotid artery or age could be considered as an indication of applying CEA or CAS. However, CEUS might be used as a perioperative assessment method to decide whether CEA or CAS should be performed to different patients. The higher the grade of plaque enhancement, the higher the risk of adverse events and restenosis for CAS might occur.

PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND, AND DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY IN ASSESSMENT OF EXTRACRANIAL INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY STENOSIS

Assessment of carotid atherosclerotic stenosis with ultrasonography versus CT angiography

Application of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Carotid Plaque Characteristics：comparison with Magnetic Resonance Angiography

Comparative study of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and histopathology of the carotid plaque in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy

Correlation of Enhancement Degree on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound with Histopathology of Carotid Plaques and Serum High Sensitive C-reactive Protein Levels in Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy

Preliminary Study on Evaluation of Neovascularization Within Carotid Soft Plaques with Contrast-Enhanced Three Dimensional Ultrasonography

Study of Carotid Soft Plaque in Patients with Cerebral Infarction with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

Correlation between Parameters of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound and Microvessel Density in Atherosclerotic Plaques

Evaluation of the effect of atorvastatin on neovascularization in the carotid atherosclerotic plaques by contrast enhanced ultrasonography

Comparison of superb micro-vascular imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of carotid artery plaque

Application of Constrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Carotid Artery Disease

[Clinical Cohort Study of Imaging Evaluation and Postoperative Pathology of Carotid Vulnerable Plaque].

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may be effective for the measurement of the free distal segment length of the internal carotid artery in carotid body tumors

Study on feature of neovascularization within carotid atherosclerotic plaques with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

Intravascular ultrasonography assisted carotid artery stenting for treatment of carotid stenosis: Two case reports

Comparison of Time-SLIP, CE-MRA and DSA in Estimation of Carotid Plaque Stenosis

Diagnostic Performance of Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque Neovascularization with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis

Comparison of carotid artery endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in patients with atherosclerotic carotid stenosis.

Diagnostic Performance of Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound and High‐Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques

Diagnosis of extracranial carotid artery stenosis: a comparative study of EBCT angiography,B-mode ultrasonography and digital subtraction angiography

Different vascular imaging diagnosis of internal carotid artery system comparison