EFFECT OF LIDOCAINE ON CERVICAL MUCOSAL ABSORPTION ON LABOR PROGRESS AND EVALUATION OF ITS EFFECT

Zhang Lin,Huang Jianxia,Wu Hanglin,Song Weinv
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19193/0393-6384_2019_3_196
2019-01-01
Acta medica mediterranea
Abstract:Objective: To observe the effect of lidocaine transcervical mucosal absorption on labor progression and maternal and fetal outcomes. Methods: A total of 228 healthy pregnant women who gave birth in our hospital from January 2017 to May 2018 were enrolled and divided into the A, B, and C groups according to a random number table, with 76 cases in each group. Group A was treated with lidocaine cervical wet compressing; Group B was treated with lidocaine cervical injection; Group C was the control Group And thus, was not treated. The first stage of labor time, the cervical swelling rate, uterine dilatation rate, the Apgar score at 1 minute and 5 minutes after birth, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal asphyxia and cervical laceration were observed in the three groups. Further, adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, sweating and palpitation were recorded in the three groups during the medication. Results: In Group A and Group B, during the first stage of labor time, cervical swelling rate at 2 h after treatment and uterine dilatation rate at 2 h after treatment, were significantly better than those in Group C (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between Group A and Group B (P>0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in Apgar score at I min after birth and 5 min after birth and neonatal asphyxia rate among the three groups (P>0.05). The number of cervical lacerations during labor progress in Group A was significantly lower than that in Group C (p<0.05). As well, the number of cases of cervical laceration in Group A was lower than that in Group B, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Lastly, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions among the three groups during the period of medication (p>0.05). Conclusion: Lidocaine can soften the cervix and shorten the first stage of labor through cervical wet compressing and cervical injection. It has no adverse effect on maternal and infant outcomes and also has higher safety levels. Compared with cervical wet compressing, the cervical laceration rate by cervical injection is higher, so attention should be paid in the course of clinical application.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?