Lu-Hf Isotopes for Negative to Low δ 18 O Magmatic Rocks of Neoproterozoic Age in South China
ZHANG Shaobing,ZHENG Yongfei
2013-01-01
Abstract:occurrence of Neoproterozoic magmatic rocks, particularly in the period of 830-740 Ma (Zhang and Zheng, 2013). These rocks occur mainly along the margins and minorly in the interior of the Yangtze Block. The finding of extremely low δO zircons (as low as -9‰ for bulk zircons, Zheng et al., 2004) and low δO magmatism in the northern margin of the Yangtze Block gained more concerns due to their possible link to Neoproterozoic glaciation events. In view of available data for zircon UPb ages and O-Hf isotopes in the middle Neoproterozoic magmatic rocks of South China with respect to their spatial distributions, we have placed further constraints on the time of water-rock interactions and the origin of these Neoproterozoic rocks. A series of studies has been made on the protolith of UHP eclogites and gneisses in the Dabie-Sulu orogenic belt (Rumble et al., 2002; Zheng et al., 2003a,b, 2004, 2006, 2007a, 2008a, 2009; Wu et al., 2007; Tang et al., 2008a, b; Chen et al., 2011; Fu et al., 2013). The results show that mafic and felsic protoliths of theses metamorphic rocks mostly have zircon U-Pb ages of 740780 Ma and are variably depleted in O. Negative δO zircon of magmatic origin only locally occurs in an UHP metagranite in the northeastern edge (Tang et al., 2008b). All zircon εHf(t) values fall into two groups, one from 1.1±0.6 to 10.1±0.6 and the other from −9.1±1.1 to −2.7±0.6. They correspond to two periods of juvenile crustal growth at 1.13±0.14 Ga and 1.98±0.22 Ga, respectively. Because zircons extracted from the Dabie-Sulu UHP rocks experienced metamorphic recrystallization or contain new overgrowth, their isotope systems are readily reset during the continental subduction-zone metamorphism. This yields mixtures of old residual and newly grown zircon domains in samples. The utilization of microbeam in-situ microanalysis enables discrimination of metamorphic domains from relict domains. The Qinglongshan eclogite and gneiss in the Sulu orogen exhibit the lowest δO values as negative as -10‰ (Chen et al., 2011). Their magmatic cores with U-Pb ages of 769±9 Ma generally have positive δO values of 0.1 to 10.1‰, and high Th/U and Lu/Hf ratios. In contrast, newly grown domains with Triassic U-Pb ages have negative δO values of -10.0 to -2.2‰, and low Th/U and Lu/Hf ratios. Therefore, the negative δO zircon domains were grown from negative δO metamorphic fluids that were generated by metamorphic dehydration of negative δO hydrothermally altered rocks. More new data for UHP rocks from different localities in the Qinling-Dabie-Sulu orogenic belt show similar results to previous ones (Fu et al., 2013). The average δO values for the Neoproterozoic ‘‘igneous’’ zircon cores vary from -0.9 to 6.9 ‰, significantly higher than that of -9.9 to 6.8 ‰ for the Triassic metamorphic rims. These results indicate that although the igneous cores have higher δO values than the metamorphic rims, the widely existence of low δO magmatism and negative δO magmatism in the northern margin of South China is still evident. Another way to eliminate the influence of metamorphism is to choose the unmetamorphosed or weakly metamorphosed rocks as the studying objects. Metagranite in the Beihuaiyang low-grade zone is such a candidate because it only suffered metamorphism of greenschist facies. Studies of granites from the Beihuaiyang zone were made by Wu et al. (2007) and Zheng et al. (2007a). The results show that these granites record two groups of U-Pb ages at 780 Ma and 750 Ma, respectively; δO values for bulk zircons are mostly lower than 4‰ and minorly comparable with normal mantle values; most zircon grains kept oscillatory zoning and a few grains show hydrothermal alteration structures; zircon and coexisting minerals show significant O isotope disequilibrium. In particular, garnet from the Wozicun ZHANG Shaobing and ZHENG Yongfei, 2013. Zircon U-Pb Ages and Lu-Hf Isotopes for Negative to Low δO Magmatic Rocks of Neoproterozoic Age in South China. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 87(supp.): 286-288.