Abstract:Iron isotopes of magnetite have been used to unravel the sources and evolutionary processes of magma and ore deposits, but most studies have focused on bulk-rock samples, which possibly provide mixed information. Magnetite is susceptible to fluid-induced metasomatism, e.g., recrystallization and coupled dissolution-reprecipitation (CDR) processes in magmatic-hydrothermal systems, resulting in textural and chemical modification and re-equilibration. The behaviors of Fe isotopes during fluid metasomatism, however, are poorly understood. Magnetite from iron oxide-apatite (IOA) deposits commonly shows multi-generation and metasomatic textures, which have been suggested to form from magmatic melts/fluids to low-temperature hydrothermal processes. In this study, we carried out in situ Fe isotopic and chemical analyses on texturally constrained magnetite from ores and their hosting trachyandesite of the giant Luohe IOA deposit, eastern China, to assess the effect of fluid-assisted metasomatic processes on both chemical and Fe isotopic compositions, and to constrain the ore-forming processes. The ores contain three types of magnetite (Mag1, Mag2 and Mag3), all of which are texturally later than albite and diopside. Pristine Mag1 grains, formed at high temperatures (>700°C), have ilmenite exsolution lamellae, and have lower Ti (0.61 to 1.55 wt. %) but higher Ni/Cr ratios (mostly >1) than those of magmatic magnetite (MagM) in the hosting trachyandesite. They also have δ 56 Fe values (0.12 to 0.52 ‰) lower than those of MagM (0.54 to 0.65 ‰), which overlap with those of high-temperature hydrothermal magnetite from iron-oxide copper-gold (IOCG), iron skarn, and porphyry Cu deposits, indicating that they were precipitated from high-temperature hypersaline fluids, as recorded by fluid inclusions within early-formed garnet, diopside, and coeval titanite. The heavy Fe isotope compositions of Mag1 are interpreted to be due to fluid exsolution under high temperatures and the preference of isotopically light Fe for earlier diopside (δ 56 Fe =-0.19 to -0.02 ‰). Mag2 grains, which show triple junction textures, were formed through a fluid-induced recrystallization process at relatively lower temperatures (∼480°C). They have δ 56 Fe values (0.29 to 0.53 ‰) similar to those of Mag1 and previously reported high-temperature hydrothermal magnetite in other deposits. In contrast, Mag3 grains, which occur as rims on Mag1 grains, were formed via CDR at much lower temperatures (<300°C). They have δ 56 Fe values (-0.15 to 0.22 ‰) significantly lower than those of pristine Mag1 and overlap those of reported low-temperature hydrothermal magnetite. Decreasing formation temperatures from Mag1 to Mag3 are consistent with the decreasing trace element concentrations (Ti, Al, and V). Our study demonstrates that IOA deposits are formed from high-temperature hypersaline magmatic fluids and that the Fe isotopes of magnetite can be significantly modified during fluid metasomatism and ore-forming processes. Therefore, trace element and in situ Fe isotopic analyses on texturally well-constrained magnetite grains are crucial for determining the origin and evolution of magmatic-hydrothermal systems.

Trace element systematics of magnetite from the Chengchao iron deposit in the Daye district:A laser ablation ICP-MS study and insights into ore genesis

Dissolution-Reprecipitation Process of Magnetite from the Chengchao Iron Deposit: Insights into Ore Genesis and Implication for In-Situ Chemical Analysis of Magnetite

Multiple dissolution-reprecipitation processes of iron oxides in the Chengchao iron skarn deposit: implications for ore genesis and elemental analysis of magnetite

The Mineral Chemistry of Magnetite and Its Constraints on Ore-Forming Mechanism in the Sandaozhuang Skarn-Type W-Mo Deposit in East Qinling, China

In-situ Major and Trace Element Geochemistry of Magnetite: Implication for Ore Forming Processes and Mechanism of the Liangshan Iron Deposit, Xinyu, China

Trace element characteristics of magnetite: Constraints on the genesis of the Lengshuikeng Ag–Pb–Zn deposit, China

In Situ Major and Trace Element Analysis of Magnetite from Carbonatite-Related Complexes: Implications for Petrogenesis and Ore Genesis

Major and Trace Elements of Magnetite from the Qimantag Metallogenic Belt: Insights into Evolution of Ore–forming Fluids

Trace element systematics of magnetite from alkaline mafic–ultramafic intrusions of the Permian Emeishan large igneous province, SW China

Magnetite texture and trace-element geochemistry fingerprint of pulsed mineralization in the Xinqiao Cu-Fe-Au deposit, Eastern China

LA-ICP-MS Trace Element Mapping: Element Mobility of Hydrothermal Magnetite from the Giant Beiya Fe-Au Skarn Deposit, SW China

Hydrothermal Origin Of The Naojiao Fe Deposit In Lingxiang District, Eastern China: Evidence From In-Situ La-Icp-Ms Magnetite Trace Element Analysis

Textures and geochemistry of magnetite: Indications for genesis of the Late Paleozoic Laoshankou Fe-Cu-Au deposit, NW China

Textural and Chemical Evolution of Magnetite from the Paleozoic Shuanglong Fe-Cu Deposit: Implications for Tracing Ore-Forming Fluids

Iron isotope fractionation during fluid metasomatism and ore-forming processes in magmatic-hydrothermal systems

The Geochemical Characteristics of Trace Elements in the Magnetite and Fe Isotope Geochemistry of the Makeng Iron Deposit in Southwest Fujian and Their Significance in Ore Genesis

Ore Genesis of the Dongping Gold Deposit in the Northern Margin of North China Craton: Constraints from In-Situ Major, Trace Elemental Analysis of Magnetite and Pyrite

Micro-textures and Chemical Compositions of Metamorphic Magnetite and Ilmenite: Insights from the Mianhuadi Mafic Complex in SW China

Characteristics and Significance of In-Situ Trace Elements of Ore Minerals from the Shalong Iron Formation in the Central Tianshan Block,NW China

Magnetite As an Indicator of Mixed Sources for W–Mo–Pb–Zn Mineralization in the Huangshaping Polymetallic Deposit, Southern Hunan Province, China

U-Pb Ages, Hf-O Isotopes and Trace Elements of Zircons from the Ore-Bearing and Ore-Barren Adakitic Rocks in the Handan-Xingtai District: Implications for Petrogenesis and Iron Mineralization