Using Garnet Peridotite to Reconstruct the Paleo-Geodynamic Settings and Evolution Processes of the Continental Subduction Zone

Zhang Cong,Huang Jie,Chen Mei,Yang JingSui
IF: 1.468
2015-01-01
Acta Petrologica Sinica
Abstract:A simplified conceptual model that can be used to classify orogenic garnet peridotites has been proposed, allowing a more systematic way to investigate such variables in nature In addition to the 'classic' mantle wedge-versus subduction zone garnet peridotites, the model subdivides mantle wedge garnet peridotites into four subtypes, called type A, B, C and D, equivalent to young/hot/dynamic- versus cold/old/static mantle in thick or thin garnet-olivine bearing mantle wedges. Two well-studied orogenic belts in Scandinavia and China have been chosen to illustrate the applicability of the model. For garnet peridotite of the Scandinavian Caledonides, the model fit well with geological observations and petrological, mineral-chemical and isotope characteristics. Different types of mantle wedge garnet peridotite can be recognized when garnet peridotites of the Western Gneiss Region ( type A = old, cold, thick, depleted mantle wedge- and/or crustal type overprinted by subduction zone garnet peridotite) are compared to those in the Seve-, Tromso- and Lindas Nappes (type C = old, cold, thin, depleted mantle wedge- and/or crustal type overprinted by subduction zone garnet peridotite). Similar investigations on the orogenic garnet peridotites from the North Qaidam orogen appear to be more complicated. There are two contrasting interpretations for the origin of the Luliangshan garnet peridotite in the North Qaidam orogenic belt: 1) type D = thin, hot, young and dynamic (Alaskan type magmatic cumulate); 2) subduction zone garnet peridotite of crustal origin; 3) type A = Archean fragments underneath a subcratonic lithosphere. Assuming universal applicability of our model, we conclude that the most important discriminative parameters are: 1) The mean bulk temperature (T) that is operative in the mantle wedge at the onset of continental collision/subduction; and 2) the thickness (P) of the lithosphere underneath the overriding plate during collision. Finally, it needs to be emphasized that both the age of melting, as well as the depth at which melting takes place (low pressure versus high pressure) are important parameters that need to be determined in garnet peridotites.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?