Mineral chemistry of biotite and its petrogenesis implication in Lingshan granite pluton

Ye Mao,Zhao He,Zhao Mian,Shu Xun,Zhang RuoXi,Yang ShuiYuan
IF: 1.468
2017-01-01
Acta Petrologica Sinica
Abstract:The Lingshan composite granite pluton is composed of an outer zone of biotite granite, and a central part of amphibolebiotite granite which contains many mafic microgranular enclaves (MME). Biotite is an important ferromagnesian mineral in most of intermediate-felsic igneous rocks, and its mineral chemistry data can record the properties of magma and the petrogenetic physicochemical conditions. In this study, we carried out a detailed petrographic study together with electric micro-probe analysis on biotites for the biotite granite, the amphibole-biotite granite and the MME, to discuss the source, physicochemical conditions, and the magma mingling/mixing processes in the Lingshan composite granite pluton. The results show significantly different chemical compositions for biotites from the biotite granite and the amphibole-biotite granite, while chemical compositions of biotites in the MME are variable. The crystallization of these biotites was all in a low oxygen fugacity. The biotites in amphibole-biotite granite and biotite granite are both rich in Fe, poor in Mg, and belong to ferri-biotite. The ratio of (Fe3+ + Fe2+) /(Fe3+ + Fe2+ Mg2+) are 0. 65 similar to 0. 70 and 0. 72 similar to 0. 78, respectively. The ratios of FeOT/MgO of biotites in both granites are close to 7. 04. The MF values [2 x Mg/(Fe2+ + Mg + Mn) ] are 0. 64 to 0. 76 for biotite from the amphibole-biotite granite, 0. 48 to 0. 60 for the biotite from the biotite granite, suggesting these tow granites are both derived from crustal source rocks. The biotites in MME vary from ferri-biotite to magnesio-biotite, and their MF values range between 0. 63 and 1. 06, which imply that magma of MME experienced magma mixing/mingling in various degrees. Amphibole-biotite granite and parts of MME have a similar crystallization condition, while other MME are obviously different with amphibole-biotite granite. The contrast between amphibole-biotite granite and MME may be a consequence of continuous and multistage interaction between felsic and mafic magmas.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?