Mesozoic and Cenozoic differential uplifting history of the North Tianshan and the South Tianshan from apatite fission-track date

Zhang Ling,Yang XiaoPing,WAN JingLin,Zheng DeWen
IF: 1.468
2018-01-01
Acta Petrologica Sinica
Abstract:The thick Cenozoic strata in the Tianshan piedmont depression have recorded not only the thermal history of deposit zone, but also the uplifting history of the mountain. We conducted Apatite Fission Track (AFT) research on a large number of samples along 3 chosen geological profiles and simulated their AFT thermal histories. Compared with the former studies, the sampling location of this study is closer to the foreland area, i.e., the sampling strata are much younger. We try to reconstruct the differential history of range growth from the Pliocene to present. The result suggests that samples from the East Qiulitage section record that the Mid-Tianshan, the South Tianshan and the East Qiulitage anticline experienced an uplift event at 55 similar to 65Ma, 20 similar to 25Ma, 5Ma, respectively. At the meanwhile, samples from the Manas section record 3 tectonic uplift events in the North Tianshan which happened at 55 65Ma, 20 25Ma and 5Ma, respectively. The uplift event started at 5Ma is the initiative point of folding and uplifting of the Manas anticline in the Urumqi piedmont depression. The combination of different AFT research results in Tianshan zone reveals that the Tianshan Mountains have three tectonic uplift phases from 150Ma to present. The whole Tianshan Mountains commenced uplifted evenly in the Mesozoic (150 similar to 125Ma). From Late Mesozoic-Early Cenozoic (100 similar to 50Ma), the starting-time of uplift in the North Tianshan is much earlier than that in the South Tianshan. The characteristics of the tectonics in the Late Cenozoic are the propagation to the foreland of the Tianshan Mountains and the smaller gap of uplift time between the South Tianshan and the North Tianshan. Despite the Tianshan Mountains underwent differential uplift on the north-south direction, the denudation rates of source zones are much the same since the Mesozoic-Cenozoic to the present. So there is no causal relationship between starting-time and the amount of uplift. The fact that different blocks have different tectonic evolution histories suggests that the tectonic should be treated as a process when it occurs in a large area. During the spreading process of deformation, there is a certain lag in space and time.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?