Atmospheric “HULIS” in Different Environments: Polarities, Molecular Sizes, and Sources Suggest More Than 50% Are Not “Humic-Like”

Tobias Spranger,Dominik van Pinxteren,Hartmut Herrmann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00299
2020-01-01
ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
Abstract:To study the complex compound mixture in atmospheric aerosol particles often referred to as "humic-like substances" (HULIS), a recently developed 2D fractionation method combining size-exclusion chromatography and reversed-phase liquid chromatography was applied to a set of 55 aerosol particle samples from five different sampling locations. The resulting heat maps, showing the 2D molecular weight versus polarity space, revealed a distinct seasonal and regional variability in the composition of solid-phase extracted water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC). Different sources were assigned to specific areas of the heat maps based on correlations with atmospheric markers. Biomass burning and secondary organic aerosol formation were found to be the most important sources, both assigned to the largest areas of the heat maps with up to 77 and 69% contribution to the total solid-phase extracted WSOC mass of individual sample clusters, respectively. Coal combustion (14-24%), traffic and industry (4-9%), and soil-derived fulvic acids (5-10%), all assigned to smaller areas of the heat maps, were identified as additional sources. Comparison with the 2D heat map of Suwannee River fulvic acids (SRFAs), a commonly used HULIS surrogate, revealed that only 37-55% of the solid-phase-extracted WSOC occupied similar areas in the molecular weight versus polarity space as SRFA. It is, therefore, suggested that only this fraction might qualify as real atmospheric "HULIS", while for the broad compound mixture obtained after solid-phase extraction (SPE), denominations like SPE-WSOC or WSOCSPE seem more appropriate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?