Effect of Recombinant Human Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor for Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Lymphopenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lin-ling Cheng,Wei-jie Guan,Chong-yang Duan,Nuo-fu Zhang,Chun-liang Lei,Yu Hu,Ai-lan Chen,Shi-yue Li,Chao Zhuo,Xi-long Deng,Fan-jun Cheng,Yong Gao,Jian-heng Zhang,Jia-xing Xie,Hong Peng,Ying-xian Li,Xiao-xiong Wu,Wen Liu,Hui Peng,Jian Wang,Guang-ming Xiao,Ping-yan Chen,Chun-yan Wang,Zi-feng Yang,Jin-cun Zhao,Nan-shan Zhong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5503
2020-01-01
JAMA Internal Medicine
Abstract:ImportanceLymphopenia is common and correlates with poor clinical outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).ObjectiveTo determine whether a therapy that increases peripheral blood leukocyte and lymphocyte cell counts leads to clinical improvement in patients with COVID-19.Design, Setting and ParticipantsBetween February 18 and April 10, 2020, we conducted an open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial at 3 participating centers in China. The main eligibility criteria were pneumonia, a blood lymphocyte cell count of 800 per μL (to convert to ×109/L, multiply by 0.001) or lower, and no comorbidities. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection was confirmed with reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction testing.ExposuresUsual care alone, or usual care plus 3 doses of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF, 5 μg/kg, subcutaneously at days 0-2).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was the time from randomization to improvement of at least 1 point on a 7-category disease severity score.ResultsOf 200 participants, 112 (56%) were men and the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 45 (40-55) years. There was random assignment of 100 patients (50%) to the rhG-CSF group and 100 (50%) to the usual care group. Time to clinical improvement was similar between groups (rhG-CSF group median of 12 days (IQR, 10-16 days) vs usual care group median of 13 days (IQR, 11-17 days); hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.95-1.71; P = .06). For secondary end points, the proportion of patients progressing to acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, or septic shock was lower in the rhG-CSF group (rhG-CSF group, 2% vs usual care group, 15%; difference, -13%; 95%CI, -21.4% to -5.4%). At 21 days, 2 patients (2%) had died in the rhG-CSF group compared with 10 patients (10%) in the usual care group (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95%CI, 0.04-0.88). At day 5, the lymphocyte cell count was higher in the rhG-CSF group (rhG-CSF group median of 1050/μL vs usual care group median of 620/μL; Hodges-Lehmann estimate of the difference in medians, 440; 95% CI, 380-490). Serious adverse events, such as sepsis or septic shock, respiratory failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome, occurred in 29 patients (14.5%) in the rhG-CSF group and 42 patients (21%) in the usual care group.Conclusion and RelevanceIn preliminary findings from a randomized clinical trial, rhG-CSF treatment for patients with COVID-19 with lymphopenia but no comorbidities did not accelerate clinical improvement, but the number of patients developing critical illness or dying may have been reduced. Larger studies that include a broader range of patients with COVID-19 should be conducted.Trial RegistrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000030007.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?