IMPORTANCE OF WILDLIFE RABIES CONTROL
R. L. Parker
Abstract:Rabies in animals has been known in North America for over two centuries, and whether the disease was i n i t i a l l y present in w i l d species or was introduced by dogs, it has been known in skunks for almost a century and a half. Today more rabies cases in w i l d animals are reported than in domestic animals, and a considerable proportion of both human and domestic animal exposures to the disease are the result of wild-animal contact. The most useful techniques for controlling w i l d animal rabies today are methods that reduce contact between infected individuals and susceptible individuals; these involve the manipulation of populations, most often by direct reduction methods. Such techniques have proved effective in controlling or eliminating the disease; they are most effective when the area involved is small and/or isolated by barriers. The effectiveness of animal reduction programs on rabies is limited by the range of the animals involved, of ingress from surrounding areas for animals incubating the disease, and the continuity of the program; at least two maximum incubation periods of the disease must have elapsed as insurance that incubating animals are not left to serve as a new nucleus of infection. Rabies control programs for w i l d species have not yet threatened any species with extinction, nor are they l i k e l y to in the future. Rabies has been recorded in North America since the mid-l8th century; the disease was reported from V i r g i n i a in 1753 and North Carolina in 1762 (Steele, 1967). Whether w i l d species infected domestic animals or were infected by dogs, or whether the disease existed in both dogs and w i l d animals independently has never been determined. The first case of skunk rabies was reported in 1826 from Lower California (Johnson, 1953), and the disease was common in skunks in Kansas in the 1870's (Hovey, 1874). A brief summary of the skunk rabies problem and protective devices in Arizona in the early 1900's are presented by Kennedy (1961). The outbreak of coyote rabies in the western states in the 'teens and its control have been described (Records, 1932). The first case of fox rabies in New York State in 1941 started an epidemic, which s t i l l continues as an endemic situation (Linhart, I960). Today w i l d animals account for over 75 percent of the total animal cases of the disease in the United States (NCDC, 1969). Bat rabies was first diagnosed in this country in 1953 (Venters, et al., 1954 and has since been reported from a l l of the 468contiguous states. Raccoon rabies has spread from Florida into the southern half of Georgia. The relationship between dog and coyote rabies in an epidemic situation in Baja California in recent times was described at the United States-Mexico Border Public Health Association meeting in San Diego (Cocozza and Malaga, 1962). All in a ll , our w i l d l i f e rabies problem has increased during the past two decades, while dog rabies declined by more than 95 percent (Parker, 1969). Dogs, because of their close association with man, are s t i l l the largest single source of rabies exposure resulting in human deaths. However, in the years 1956 through 1969, 10 of the 31 cases of rabies (32 percent) for which the exposure source was known or a most probable source determined have been the result of rabies virus transmitted by w i l d animals. In addition to the seriousness of w i l d l i f e rabies from a public health point of view, the economic problems need to be considered. Not only must persons bitten by w i l d animals in an area infected with rabies be concerned about their health, they must bear the financial burden of expensive and time consuming preventive treatments. Another economic burden is the loss of livestock from rabies transmitted by w i l d animals. In the several states where I have had personal experience, including most of the northern and the southwestern states, most if not a l l of the rabies in large domestic animals is either known or thought to be the result of the bites of rabid foxes, skunks, and to a somewhat lesser degree coyotes and bobcats. Bats, although thought to be responsible for no less than s i x human cases of rabies, are not now known to be a threat to livestock in th i s country. Their relationship to rabies in other wild species is not clear. Direct evidence is lacking but there is some epidemio-logic evidence that interspecies transfer of the virus may occur between bats and other species under certain circumstances (Constantine, 1962).