Abstract:Transition-metal-catalyzed C-O bond activation provides a useful strategy for utilizing alcohol- and phenol-derived electrophiles in cross-coupling reactions, which has become a research field of active and growing interest in organic chemistry. The synergy between computation and experiment elucidated the mechanistic model and controlling factors of selectivities in these transformations, leading to advances in innovative C-O bond activation and functionalization methods.Toward the rational design of C-O bond activation, our collaborations with the Jarvo group bridged the mechanistic models of C(sp2)-O and C(sp3)-O bond activations. We found that the nickel catalyst cleaves the benzylic and allylic C(sp3)-O bonds via two general mechanisms: the stereoinvertive SN2 back-side attack model and the stereoretentive chelation-assisted model. These two models control the stereochemistry in a wide array of stereospecific Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions with benzylic or allylic alcohol derivatives. Because of the catalyst distortion, the ligands can differentiate the competing stereospecific C(sp3)-O bond activations. The PCy3 ligand interacts with nickel mainly through σ-donation, and the Ni(PCy3) catalyst can undergo facile bending of the substrate-nickel-ligand angle, which favors the stereoretentive benzylic C-O bond activation. The N-heterocyclic carbene SIMes ligand has additional d(metal)-p(ligand) back-donation with nickel, which leads to an extra energy penalty for the same angle bending. This results in the preference of stereoinvertive benzylic C-O bond activation under Ni/SIMes catalysis. In addition to ligand control, a Lewis acid can increase the selectivity for stereoinvertive C(sp3)-O activation by stabilizing the SN2 back-side attack transition state. The oxygen leaving group complexes with the MgI2 Lewis acid in the stereoinvertive activation, leading to the exclusive stereoinvertive Kumada coupling of benzylic ethers. We also identified that the competing C(sp3)-O bond activation models have noticeable differences in charge separation. This leads to the solvent polarity control of the stereospecificity in C(sp3)-O activations. Low-polarity solvents favor the neutral stereoretentive C-O bond activation, while high-polarity solvents favor the zwitterionic stereoinvertive cleavage.In sharp contrast to the nickel catalysts, the C(sp2)-O bond activation under palladium catalysis mainly proceeds via the classic three-membered ring oxidative addition mechanism instead of the chelation-assisted mechanism. This is due to the lower oxophilicity of palladium, which disfavors the oxygen coordination in the chelation-assisted-type activation. The three-membered ring activation model selectively cleaves the weak C-O bond, resulting in the exclusive chemoselectivity of acyl C-O bond activation in Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions with aryl carboxylic acid derivatives. This explains the overall acylation in the Pd-catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura coupling with aryl esters. In collaboration with the Szostak group, we revealed that the three-membered ring model applies in the Pd-catalyzed C-O bond activation of carboxylic acid anhydride, which stimulated the development of a series of Pd-catalyzed decarbonylative functionalizations of aryl carboxylic acids.

Mechanisms of Chemoselectivity for Acyl and Decarbonylative Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling of N-acetyl Amide with Arylboronic Acid Catalyzed by Pd and Ni Catalysts: Insights from DFT Calculations

Palladium-catalyzed Decarbonylative Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling of Amides by Carbon-Nitrogen Bond Activation

Mechanism and Origins of Ligand-Controlled Stereoselectivity of Ni-Catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura Coupling with Benzylic Esters: A Computational Study

Palladium-Catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura Coupling of Aryl Esters

Mechanisms and Origins of Switchable Chemoselectivity of Ni-Catalyzed C(Aryl)-O and C(Acyl)-O Activation of Aryl Esters with Phosphine Ligands

Decarbonylative Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling of Aroyl Chlorides.

Mechanism and Selectivity Control in Ni- and Pd-Catalyzed Cross-Couplings Involving Carbon–Oxygen Bond Activation

Factors Controlling The Reactivity And Chemoselectivity Of Resonance Destabilized Amides In Ni-Catalyzed Decarbonylative And Nondecarbonylative Suzuki-Miyaura Coupling

Palladium complexes containing NNN pincer type ligands and their activities in Suzuki-Miyaura cross coupling reaction

Mechanistic Study of Suzuki–Miyaura Cross‐Coupling Reactions of Amides Mediated by [Pd(NHC)(allyl)Cl] Precatalysts

Why Different Ligands Can Control Stereochemistry Selectivity of Ni-catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling of Benzylic Carbamates with Arylboronic Esters: a Mechanistic Study.

Bimetallic Cooperative Catalysis for Decarbonylative Heteroarylation of Carboxylic Acids Via C‐O/C‐H Coupling

Palladium‐Catalyzed Decarbonylative Borylation of Carboxylic Acids: Tuning Reaction Selectivity by Computation

Mechanisms and Reactivity Differences for Cycloaddition of Anhydride to Alkyne Catalyzed by Palladium and Nickel Catalysts: Insight from Density Functional Calculations.

Palladium-NHC (NHC = N-heterocyclic Carbene)-Catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling of Alkyl Amides

Nickel-Based Catalysts for the Selective Monoarylation of Dichloropyridines: Ligand Effects and Mechanistic Insights

Efficient nickel precatalysts for Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling of aryl chlorides and arylboronic acids under mild conditions

Mechanism of Nickel-Catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura Coupling of Amides

Arylhydrazone‐Thioeter Palladium Pincer Complexes Catalyzed Carbonylative Suzuki–Miyaura Cross‐Coupling Using Fe(CO)5 as CO Surrogate

Reaction scope and mechanistic insights of nickel-catalyzed migratory Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling

Synergistic Ni/Pd Catalysis for Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation of 2-Acyl Imidazoles.