Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the evaluation value of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at different time points in the prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia combined with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).METHODS:A retrospective cohort study method was conducted, including patients with severe pneumonia and ARDS admitted to the emergency intensive care unit (ICU) of General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University from January 2015 to December 2019. General clinical data such as gender, age, and the SOFA scores at 1, 2, 3, and 7 days after admission were recorded. According to the diagnostic test, the prognostic evaluation value of SOFA score in patients with severe pneumonia combined with ARDS at different time points and different ages was analyzed.RESULTS:A total of 88 cases were included in this study, eventually, 42 cases were survived and 46 cases died, the mortality was 52.27%. The age of the death group was significantly older than the survival group (years old: 60.67±14.66 vs. 51.91±15.97), the SOFA score at each time point were significantly higher than those in the survival group (9.83±3.50 vs. 7.54±2.67, 9.98±3.75 vs. 7.48±2.92, 10.84±4.14 vs. 7.23±2.94, 11.71±4.03 vs. 6.51±3.22, respectively at 1, 2, 3, 7 days after admission, all P < 0.01). The receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) showed that the SOFA score at 1, 2, 3, and 7 days after admission had a certain predictive value for the prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia combined with ARDS (all P < 0.01), and with the prolong of ICU stay, the area under ROC curve (AUC) of SOFA score had gradually increased. On the 7th day after admission, the SOFA score had the highest sensitivity in predicting severe pneumonia combined with ARDS patients, which was 92.86%, and the specificity was the highest on the 3rd day after admission, which was 88.10%. The AUC in day 7 was significantly higher than day 2 (0.85 vs. 0.72), there was no statistically significant difference of AUC at other time points. After stratifying by age, the diagnostic of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC of SOFA score for the prognosis had gradually increased, and the predictive value was better. However, only on day 3 after admission, the AUC of SOFA score was significantly higher than day 1 (0.80 vs. 0.77, P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in AUC at other time points. In patients older than 60 years old, the AUC of the SOFA score predicting the prognosis of patients was relatively small on day 1 and day 2 (0.67, 0.68, respectively), the ability was poor. There was no statistically significant difference in the AUC of SOFA scores at each time point in evaluating the prognosis of patients. The trends over time of patients at different ages and time points showed that regardless of age, the SOFA scores of the patients in the death group showed an upward trend, while showed a downward trend in the survival group, the difference reached the largest on the 7th day after admission, and the death group was significantly higher than the survival group (age < 60 years old: 12.50 vs. 6.69; age ≥ 60 years old: 11.58 vs. 6.21).CONCLUSIONS:The initial SOFA score has a certain value in the evaluation of prognosis of severe pneumonia patients combined with ARDS, but the effect is poor for elderly patients.

Predictive Value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for Prognosis in Patients with Severe Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Retrospective Study

Prognostic value of SOFA combined with chest CT severity score in patients with critical COVID-19 pneumonia: a retrospective study

Predictive Value of Qsofa Score for Death in Emergency Department Resuscitation Room among Adult Trauma Patients:A Retrospective Study

[Evaluation Value of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Due to Severe Pneumonia].

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score and Mortality Prediction in Patients With Severe Respiratory Distress Secondary to COVID-19

[Meta analysis of the predictive efficacy of various derived indicators of sequential organ failure assessment in outcomes of patients with sepsis].

Contributions of individual qSOFA elements to assessment of severity and for prediction of mortality

Comparison of Three Different Organ Failure Assessment Score Systems in Predicting Outcome of Severe Sepsis

[Prognosis analysis of multi-indicator combined with sequential organ failure assessment in patients with sepsis]

Predictive Performance of SOFA and Qsofa for In-Hospital Mortality in Severe Novel Coronavirus Disease

SOFA Score in relation to Sepsis: Clinical Implications in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognostic Assessment

Application of sequential organ failure assessment score in prediction of prognosis in patients with liver failure

Importance of qSOFA Score in Terms of Prognosis and Mortality in Critical Care Patients

Association of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) components with mortality

Prognostic value of PaO/FiO, SOFA and D-dimer in elderly patients with sepsis

[Assessment of the severity scores in patients included in a sepsis code in an Emergency Departament]

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Predicts Outcomes of Pulse Indicator Contour Continuous Cardiac Output-Directed Goal Therapy

Prognostic Value of PaO2/FiO2, SOFA and D-dimer in Elderly Patients with Sepsis

Evaluation of the predicting effect of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment on septic shock

Preintubation Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Predicting COVID-19 Mortality

A Time-Incorporated SOFA Score-Based Machine Learning Model for Predicting Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter, Real-world Study