Abstract:Nucleic acid–ligand interactions play an important role in numerous cellular processes such as gene function expression and regulation. Therefore, nucleic acids such as RNAs have become more and more important drug targets, where the structural determination of nucleic acid–ligand complexes is pivotal for understanding their functions and thus developing therapeutic interventions. Molecular docking has been a useful computational tool in predicting the complex structure between molecules. However, although a number of docking algorithms have been developed for protein–ligand interactions, only a few docking programs were presented for nucleic acid–ligand interactions. Here, we have developed a fast nucleic acid–ligand docking algorithm, named NLDock, by implementing our intrinsic scoring function ITScoreNL for nucleic acid–ligand interactions into a modified version of the MDock program. NLDock was extensively evaluated on four test sets and compared with five other state-of-the-art docking algorithms including AutoDock, DOCK 6, rDock, GOLD, and Glide. It was shown that our NLDock algorithm obtained a significantly better performance than the other docking programs in binding mode predictions and achieved the success rates of 73%, 36%, and 32% on the largest test set of 77 complexes for local rigid-, local flexible-, and global flexible-ligand docking, respectively. In addition, our NLDock approach is also computationally efficient and consumed an average of as short as 0.97 and 2.08 min for a local flexible-ligand docking job and a global flexible-ligand docking job, respectively. These results suggest the good performance of our NLDock in both docking accuracy and computational efficiency.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00341.Docking parameters for NLDOCK, AutoDock, rDock, and DOCK 6 and binding site definition and docking performances of global flexible-ligand docking for NLDock (PDF)Running times of different docking programs (XLSX)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Parametrization of a specific free energy function for automated docking against RNA targets using neural networks

Docking to RNA via Root-Mean-Square-Deviation-Driven Energy Minimization with Flexible Ligands and Flexible Targets

NLDock: a Fast Nucleic Acid–Ligand Docking Algorithm for Modeling RNA/DNA–Ligand Complexes

Accuracy Assessment of Protein-Based Docking Programs Against RNA Targets

An accurate and universal protein-small molecule batch docking solution using Autodock Vina

Pose prediction accuracy in ligand docking to RNA

DoRIAT: A Bayesian Framework For Interpreting And Annotating Docking Runs.

DockingApp RF: A State-of-the-Art Novel Scoring Function for Molecular Docking in a User-Friendly Interface to AutoDock Vina

Docking guidance with experimental ligand structural density improves docking pose prediction and virtual screening performance

EDock: blind protein-ligand docking by replica-exchange monte carlo simulation

Multi-scale Iterative Refinement towards Robust and Versatile Molecular Docking

Compact assessment of molecular surface complementarities enhances neural network-aided prediction of key binding residues

Uni-Mol Docking V2: Towards Realistic and Accurate Binding Pose Prediction

CovalentDock: Automated Covalent Docking with Parameterized Covalent Linkage Energy Estimation and Molecular Geometry Constraints.

The role of binding entropy in the refinement of protein-ligand docking predictions: analysis based on the use of 11 scoring functions

The latest automated docking technologies for novel drug discovery

A selective method for optimizing ensemble docking-based experiments on an InhA Fully-Flexible receptor model

Accurate physics-based prediction of binding affinities of RNA and DNA targeting ligands

Targeting RNA with Small Molecules using State-of-the-Art Methods Provides Highly Predictive Affinities of Riboswitch Inhibitors

How to improve docking accuracy of AutoDock4.2: a case study using different electrostatic potentials.