NuRD and Pluripotency: a Complex Balancing Act.

Guang Hu,Paul A. Wade
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.04.011
IF: 23.9
2012-01-01
Cell Stem Cell
Abstract:Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are defined by two essential features—pluripotency and self-renewal—whose balance requires the concerted action of signal transduction pathways, transcription factor networks, and epigenetic regulators. Recent findings have implicated the NuRD chromatin remodeling complex in the sophisticated choreography of ESC regulatory pathways. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are defined by two essential features—pluripotency and self-renewal—whose balance requires the concerted action of signal transduction pathways, transcription factor networks, and epigenetic regulators. Recent findings have implicated the NuRD chromatin remodeling complex in the sophisticated choreography of ESC regulatory pathways. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) face a special regulatory challenge essential to their unique biological properties. These cells must maintain the capacity to self-renew, while having the potential, upon receiving appropriate physiologic cues, to differentiate along diverse lineages. These properties imply an ability to maintain expression of genes integral to the pluripotency program in such a manner that they can be rapidly silenced upon receiving a signal to differentiate. Likewise, genes involved in embryonic development must be silent, with the potential for rapid activation. The chromatin status of ESCs reflects their unique physiologic needs. ESCs have a significant number of genes that are characterized by very specific and unique histone and DNA modifications and are enriched for essential genes in early embryonic development and developmental regulatory transcription factors (Meissner, 2010Meissner A. Epigenetic modifications in pluripotent and differentiated cells.Nat. Biotechnol. 2010; 28: 1079-1088Crossref PubMed Scopus (292) Google Scholar). The promoters of these genes are characterized by the simultaneous presence, under certain growth conditions, of histone modifications with seemingly opposite functions. Individual nucleosomes at these promoters exhibit trimethylation of two different residues of histone H3: lysine 4 (H3K4me3) and lysine 27 (H3K27me3). While H3K4me3 is enriched at promoters of actively transcribing genes or genes with the potential for active transcription, H3K27me3 is associated with stable gene silencing. Loci at which these two histone marks are juxtaposed on the same nucleosome are referred to as bivalent (Meissner, 2010Meissner A. Epigenetic modifications in pluripotent and differentiated cells.Nat. Biotechnol. 2010; 28: 1079-1088Crossref PubMed Scopus (292) Google Scholar). Bivalent genes are generally transcriptionally silent in ESCs but are poised for rapid activation in the appropriate lineages during embryonic development. In addition, these bivalent promoters are characterized by the presence of a newly described form of DNA modification, 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine. How the enzymes that deposit these chromatin marks interact with the core pluripotency network to regulate the balance between self-renewal and differentiation remains a central puzzle in ESC biology. A recent set of papers (Reynolds et al., 2012aReynolds N. Latos P. Hynes-Allen A. Loos R. Leaford D. O'Shaughnessy A. Mosaku O. Signolet J. Brennecke P. Kalkan T. et al.NuRD suppresses pluripotency gene expression to promote transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment.Cell Stem Cell. 2012; 10 (this issue): 583-594Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (166) Google Scholar, Whyte et al., 2012Whyte W.A. Bilodeau S. Orlando D.A. Hoke H.A. Frampton G.M. Foster C.T. Cowley S.M. Young R.A. Enhancer decommissioning by LSD1 during embryonic stem cell differentiation.Nature. 2012; 482: 221-225Crossref PubMed Scopus (422) Google Scholar, Yildirim et al., 2011Yildirim O. Li R. Hung J.H. Chen P.B. Dong X. Ee L.S. Weng Z. Rando O.J. Fazzio T.G. Mbd3/NURD complex regulates expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine marked genes in embryonic stem cells.Cell. 2011; 147: 1498-1510Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (353) Google Scholar) has provided fresh insights into mechanisms underlying the regulation of the pluripotency program and its response to developmental cues, indicating a central role for the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) complex in this complicated regulatory process. The NuRD chromatin remodeling complex was defined biochemically more than a decade ago (Ramírez and Hagman, 2009Ramírez J. Hagman J. The Mi-2/NuRD complex: a critical epigenetic regulator of hematopoietic development, differentiation and cancer.Epigenetics. 2009; 4: 532-536Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar). At the time of its discovery, this complex was unique in that it possessed two distinct enzymatic functions directed at chromatin-dependent gene regulation—histone deacetylase function from the HDAC1 and HDAC2 subunits and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling, a property of the Mi-2α/β subunits. Further, NuRD contains a member of the methyl-CpG binding domain family of proteins, MBD3, although mammalian MBD3 lacks the capacity to bind methylated DNA substrates with high affinity. At the time of its discovery more than a decade ago, prevailing models predicted that this complex was recruited to promoters through direct interactions with DNA sequence-specific transcriptional repressors where its enzymatic functions—histone deacetylation and chromatin remodeling—were integral to the process of stable gene silencing (Ramírez and Hagman, 2009Ramírez J. Hagman J. The Mi-2/NuRD complex: a critical epigenetic regulator of hematopoietic development, differentiation and cancer.Epigenetics. 2009; 4: 532-536Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar). This classic, static model for NuRD function is now called into question by a very recent set of papers describing a much more dynamic role for NuRD in maintenance of gene activity in ESCs (Reynolds et al., 2012aReynolds N. Latos P. Hynes-Allen A. Loos R. Leaford D. O'Shaughnessy A. Mosaku O. Signolet J. Brennecke P. Kalkan T. et al.NuRD suppresses pluripotency gene expression to promote transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment.Cell Stem Cell. 2012; 10 (this issue): 583-594Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (166) Google Scholar, Whyte et al., 2012Whyte W.A. Bilodeau S. Orlando D.A. Hoke H.A. Frampton G.M. Foster C.T. Cowley S.M. Young R.A. Enhancer decommissioning by LSD1 during embryonic stem cell differentiation.Nature. 2012; 482: 221-225Crossref PubMed Scopus (422) Google Scholar, Yildirim et al., 2011Yildirim O. Li R. Hung J.H. Chen P.B. Dong X. Ee L.S. Weng Z. Rando O.J. Fazzio T.G. Mbd3/NURD complex regulates expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine marked genes in embryonic stem cells.Cell. 2011; 147: 1498-1510Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (353) Google Scholar). Elegant genetic analysis by Hendrich and colleagues defined an essential role for MBD3 in integrity of the NuRD complex in murine ESCs (MBD3 null ESCs fail to form functional NuRD complex) and, surprisingly, demonstrated that deletion of MBD3 and disruption of the NuRD complex did not significantly impact ESC self-renewal (Kaji et al., 2006Kaji K. Caballero I.M. MacLeod R. Nichols J. Wilson V.A. Hendrich B. The NuRD component Mbd3 is required for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells.Nat. Cell Biol. 2006; 8: 285-292Crossref PubMed Scopus (296) Google Scholar). However, MBD3 deletion led to defects in morphological changes, downregulation of ESC markers, and upregulation of lineage markers upon LIF withdrawal or during embryoid body formation, indicating that the NuRD complex is required for normal differentiation. In vivo, MBD3 null ESCs fail to make significant contributions to chimeric embryos and can block the ability of wild-type morulae to form functional embryos. One possible mechanism by which the NuRD complex can regulate differentiation is through the proper silencing of pluripotency genes. In this issue of Cell Stem Cell, Reynolds et al., 2012aReynolds N. Latos P. Hynes-Allen A. Loos R. Leaford D. O'Shaughnessy A. Mosaku O. Signolet J. Brennecke P. Kalkan T. et al.NuRD suppresses pluripotency gene expression to promote transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment.Cell Stem Cell. 2012; 10 (this issue): 583-594Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (166) Google Scholar demonstrated using genetically manipulated ESCs that loss of MBD3 leads to aberrant upregulation of genes integral to the pluripotency network (including Zfp42, Tbx3, Klf4, and Klf5) under normal growth conditions (Figure 1A ), although expression of the core pluripotency transcription factors Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog are not affected. MBD3 deletion resulted in their sustained expression upon LIF withdrawal, and knocking down one of them, Klf4, could partially rescue the differentiation defects. Chromatin immunoprecipitation visualized by quantitative PCR demonstrated that MBD3 and Mi-2β both occupy the promoters and gene bodies of these pluripotency genes in a broad pattern stretching across several kilobases of DNA (Figure 2B ). These findings are consistent with the LIF-independent ESC maintenance phenotype observed in the MBD3 null cells, as Tbx3, Klf4, and Klf5 act downstream in the LIF-Stat3 pathway (Niwa et al., 2009Niwa H. Ogawa K. Shimosato D. Adachi K. A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells.Nature. 2009; 460: 118-122Crossref PubMed Scopus (672) Google Scholar).Figure 2NuRD Complex Action and Distribution in the ESC GenomeShow full caption(A) Fazzio and colleagues provide evidence suggesting that NuRD complex localizes to specific regions of the genome through direct interaction of MBD3 with 5hmC modified DNA, a mark deposited by TET1 (Yildirim et al., 2011Yildirim O. Li R. Hung J.H. Chen P.B. Dong X. Ee L.S. Weng Z. Rando O.J. Fazzio T.G. Mbd3/NURD complex regulates expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine marked genes in embryonic stem cells.Cell. 2011; 147: 1498-1510Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (353) Google Scholar).(B) ChIP PCR (Reynolds et al., 2012aReynolds N. Latos P. Hynes-Allen A. Loos R. Leaford D. O'Shaughnessy A. Mosaku O. Signolet J. Brennecke P. Kalkan T. et al.NuRD suppresses pluripotency gene expression to promote transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment.Cell Stem Cell. 2012; 10 (this issue): 583-594Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (166) Google Scholar) and ChIP-Seq (Reynolds et al., 2012bReynolds N. Salmon-Divon M. Dvinge H. Hynes-Allen A. Balasooriya G. Leaford D. Behrens A. Bertone P. Hendrich B. NuRD-mediated deacetylation of H3K27 facilitates recruitment of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 to direct gene repression.EMBO J. 2012; 31: 593-605Crossref PubMed Scopus (184) Google Scholar) depict (yellow shaded areas) broad distribution of NuRD complex across kilobases of DNA surrounding the TSS of pluripotency genes. Note that this model depicts a gap in NuRD complex enrichment over the TSS. ChIP-Seq (Yildirim et al., 2011Yildirim O. Li R. Hung J.H. Chen P.B. Dong X. Ee L.S. Weng Z. Rando O.J. Fazzio T.G. Mbd3/NURD complex regulates expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine marked genes in embryonic stem cells.Cell. 2011; 147: 1498-1510Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (353) Google Scholar) determination of focal localization of NuRD complex in ESCs is shown (yellow shaded areas). Strongest peaks were detected slightly downstream of the TSS, little to no enrichment was noted at enhancers. ChIP-Seq (Whyte et al., 2012Whyte W.A. Bilodeau S. Orlando D.A. Hoke H.A. Frampton G.M. Foster C.T. Cowley S.M. Young R.A. Enhancer decommissioning by LSD1 during embryonic stem cell differentiation.Nature. 2012; 482: 221-225Crossref PubMed Scopus (422) Google Scholar) of NuRD complex in ESCs (yellow shaded areas) in focal areas of enrichment coincident with both enhancers and core promoters is shown. Enrichment at enhancers was noted in peaks larger than those detected near the TSS.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) (A) Fazzio and colleagues provide evidence suggesting that NuRD complex localizes to specific regions of the genome through direct interaction of MBD3 with 5hmC modified DNA, a mark deposited by TET1 (Yildirim et al., 2011Yildirim O. Li R. Hung J.H. Chen P.B. Dong X. Ee L.S. Weng Z. Rando O.J. Fazzio T.G. Mbd3/NURD complex regulates expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine marked genes in embryonic stem cells.Cell. 2011; 147: 1498-1510Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (353) Google Scholar). (B) ChIP PCR (Reynolds et al., 2012aReynolds N. Latos P. Hynes-Allen A. Loos R. Leaford D. O'Shaughnessy A. Mosaku O. Signolet J. Brennecke P. Kalkan T. et al.NuRD suppresses pluripotency gene expression to promote transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment.Cell Stem Cell. 2012; 10 (this issue): 583-594Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (166) Google Scholar) and ChIP-Seq (Reynolds et al., 2012bReynolds N. Salmon-Divon M. Dvinge H. Hynes-Allen A. Balasooriya G. Leaford D. Behrens A. Bertone P. Hendrich B. NuRD-mediated deacetylation of H3K27 facilitates recruitment of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 to direct gene repression.EMBO J. 2012; 31: 593-605Crossref PubMed Scopus (184) Google Scholar) depict (yellow shaded areas) broad distribution of NuRD complex across kilobases of DNA surrounding the TSS of pluripotency genes. Note that this model depicts a gap in NuRD complex enrichment over the TSS. ChIP-Seq (Yildirim et al., 2011Yildirim O. Li R. Hung J.H. Chen P.B. Dong X. Ee L.S. Weng Z. Rando O.J. Fazzio T.G. Mbd3/NURD complex regulates expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine marked genes in embryonic stem cells.Cell. 2011; 147: 1498-1510Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (353) Google Scholar) determination of focal localization of NuRD complex in ESCs is shown (yellow shaded areas). Strongest peaks were detected slightly downstream of the TSS, little to no enrichment was noted at enhancers. ChIP-Seq (Whyte et al., 2012Whyte W.A. Bilodeau S. Orlando D.A. Hoke H.A. Frampton G.M. Foster C.T. Cowley S.M. Young R.A. Enhancer decommissioning by LSD1 during embryonic stem cell differentiation.Nature. 2012; 482: 221-225Crossref PubMed Scopus (422) Google Scholar) of NuRD complex in ESCs (yellow shaded areas) in focal areas of enrichment coincident with both enhancers and core promoters is shown. Enrichment at enhancers was noted in peaks larger than those detected near the TSS. It was previously known that the expression of Zfp42, Tbx3, Klf4, and Klf5 is heterogeneous in ESCs cultured in serum and LIF (Toyooka et al., 2008Toyooka Y. Shimosato D. Murakami K. Takahashi K. Niwa H. Identification and characterization of subpopulations in undifferentiated ES cell culture.Development. 2008; 135: 909-918Crossref PubMed Scopus (429) Google Scholar) and that there are subpopulations of cells expressing low or high levels of these proteins. In the absence of MBD3, however, the low-expressing cell population disappeared and all the cells express higher levels, suggesting that NuRD is responsible for the repression of these genes during normal ESC culture (Reynolds et al., 2012aReynolds N. Latos P. Hynes-Allen A. Loos R. Leaford D. O'Shaughnessy A. Mosaku O. Signolet J. Brennecke P. Kalkan T. et al.NuRD suppresses pluripotency gene expression to promote transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment.Cell Stem Cell. 2012; 10 (this issue): 583-594Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (166) Google Scholar). These findings support a model in which a balance between transcriptional activation from the LIF-Stat3 pathway and repression from the NuRD complex is in dynamic equilibrium at a subset of pluripotency genes in ESCs (Figure 1A) resulting in the observed transcriptional heterogeneity. By extension, NuRD-mediated repression of these same pluripotency genes is probably a necessary step for differentiation. It is important to note that NuRD-mediated repression does not operate to silence all pluripotency genes. For example, MBD3 deletion does not impact expression of the core pluripotency transcription factors Nanog, Oct4, and Sox2 (Reynolds et al., 2012aReynolds N. Latos P. Hynes-Allen A. Loos R. Leaford D. O'Shaughnessy A. Mosaku O. Signolet J. Brennecke P. Kalkan T. et al.NuRD suppresses pluripotency gene expression to promote transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment.Cell Stem Cell. 2012; 10 (this issue): 583-594Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (166) Google Scholar). Additionally, Nanog is also known to be expressed in a heterogeneous fashion in ESCs cultured in serum and LIF (Chambers et al., 2007Chambers I. Silva J. Colby D. Nichols J. Nijmeijer B. Robertson M. Vrana J. Jones K. Grotewold L. Smith A. Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development.Nature. 2007; 450: 1230-1234Crossref PubMed Scopus (1154) Google Scholar). Its expression is controlled by an allelic regulatory mechanism independent of DNA methylation (Miyanari and Torres-Padilla, 2012Miyanari Y. Torres-Padilla M.E. Control of ground-state pluripotency by allelic regulation of Nanog.Nature. 2012; 483: 470-473Crossref PubMed Scopus (181) Google Scholar). In another very recent study from the same group, an important relationship was established between NuRD and another chromatin modifying complex, PRC2 (Reynolds et al., 2012bReynolds N. Salmon-Divon M. Dvinge H. Hynes-Allen A. Balasooriya G. Leaford D. Behrens A. Bertone P. Hendrich B. NuRD-mediated deacetylation of H3K27 facilitates recruitment of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 to direct gene repression.EMBO J. 2012; 31: 593-605Crossref PubMed Scopus (184) Google Scholar). PRC2, polycomb repressive complex 2, is responsible for the repressive histone mark H3K27me3, which is deposited on chromatin by its subunit EZH2 (Meissner, 2010Meissner A. Epigenetic modifications in pluripotent and differentiated cells.Nat. Biotechnol. 2010; 28: 1079-1088Crossref PubMed Scopus (292) Google Scholar). NuRD was shown to occupy genomic loci corresponding to genes marked by H3K4 trimethylation as well as bivalent genes in ESCs and may thereby modulate actively transcribed genes as well as those marked by bivalent chromatin for eventual expression at a later point in development. MBD3 deletion led to an increase in H3K27 acetylation and a loss of H3K27 trimethylation at the bivalent NuRD target genes, suggesting a concerted action between NuRD (deacetylating lysine 27) and polycomb complexes—specifically PRC2, which methylates lysine 27—at these sites (Figure 1A). Indeed, MBD3 deletion or HDAC inhibition impaired the binding of PRC2 components to some of the NuRD target genes. On the contrary, deletion of PRC2 components did not affect binding of the NuRD complex to its target genes. Thus, recruitment of PRC2 at NuRD target loci is dependent on the presence and activity of NuRD. Consistently, deletion or knockdown of MBD3 or components of the PRC complexes induced overlapping gene expression changes, including the upregulation of several genes involved in embryonic development (Reynolds et al., 2012bReynolds N. Salmon-Divon M. Dvinge H. Hynes-Allen A. Balasooriya G. Leaford D. Behrens A. Bertone P. Hendrich B. NuRD-mediated deacetylation of H3K27 facilitates recruitment of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 to direct gene repression.EMBO J. 2012; 31: 593-605Crossref PubMed Scopus (184) Google Scholar). Taken together, the above findings supported the following model for NuRD's function in ESC differentiation (Figure 1A): MBD3/NuRD deacetylates histone lysine residues (including H3K27) at genes involved in embryonic development or pluripotency. At some genes (those downstream of LIF or of the core pluripotency network), the continued action of histone acetyltransferase (HAT) enzymes rapidly resets acetylation state, resulting in an equilibrium favoring active transcription. At other genes (genes involved in embryonic development), the hypoacetylated state at lysine 27 resulting from NuRD-dependent deacetylation is permissive for PRC2 recruitment, H3K27 trimethylation, and transcriptional repression. Thus, NuRD-mediated deacetylation serves as a brake to fine-tune the expression of pluripotency genes and provides a mechanism for maintenance of genes involved in embryonic development in a poised or silent state. In agreement with this model, PRC2 has been shown to play important roles in ESC differentiation. Loss of PRC2 function in ESCs results in mis-regulation of pluripotency and developmental genes and defects in differentiation (Table 1).Table 1Null Phenotypes of NuRD, PRC2, and Other Chromatin RegulatorsComplexGeneES phenotypeMouse phenotypeReferenceNuRDMBD3Mbd3 null ESCs are viable and can initiate differentiation in embryoid bodies or chimeric embryos but cannot completely silence pluripotency genes or commit to developmental lineages.Mbd3 null mice die around midgestation. Null embryos have defective epiblast expansion and extraembryonic tissue development starting at E5.5.Kaji et al., 2006Kaji K. Caballero I.M. MacLeod R. Nichols J. Wilson V.A. Hendrich B. The NuRD component Mbd3 is required for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells.Nat. Cell Biol. 2006; 8: 285-292Crossref PubMed Scopus (296) Google Scholar, Kaji et al., 2007Kaji K. Nichols J. Hendrich B. Mbd3, a component of the NuRD co-repressor complex, is required for development of pluripotent cells.Development. 2007; 134: 1123-1132Crossref PubMed Scopus (131) Google ScholarPRC2EedEed null ESCs are viable and can differentiate in embryoid bodies. They can contribute to chimeras (up to E9.5), but their in vitro differentiation capacity is impaired.Eed null mice are embryonic lethal by E9.5. Null embryos exhibit growth defects and primitive streak formation and/or organization.Chamberlain et al., 2008Chamberlain S.J. Yee D. Magnuson T. Polycomb repressive complex 2 is dispensable for maintenance of embryonic stem cell pluripotency.Stem Cells. 2008; 26: 1496-1505Crossref PubMed Scopus (269) Google Scholar, Leeb et al., 2010Leeb M. Pasini D. Novatchkova M. Jaritz M. Helin K. Wutz A. Polycomb complexes act redundantly to repress genomic repeats and genes.Genes Dev. 2010; 24: 265-276Crossref PubMed Scopus (272) Google ScholarEzh2Ezh2 null ESCs can self-renew and differentiate. They have impaired differentiation capacity, but not to the extent seen in Eed null ESCs.Ezh2 null mice arre embryonic lethal before E8.5. Null embryos can initiate but cannot complete gastrulation.O'Carroll et al., 2001O'Carroll D. Erhardt S. Pagani M. Barton S.C. Surani M.A. Jenuwein T. The polycomb-group gene Ezh2 is required for early mouse development.Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001; 21: 4330-4336Crossref PubMed Scopus (696) Google Scholar; Shen et al., 2008Shen X. Liu Y. Hsu Y.J. Fujiwara Y. Kim J. Mao X. Yuan G.C. Orkin S.H. EZH1 mediates methylation on histone H3 lysine 27 and complements EZH2 in maintaining stem cell identity and executing pluripotency.Mol. Cell. 2008; 32: 491-502Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (709) Google ScholarSuz12Suz12 null cells are viable but have impaired differentiation capacity.Suz12 null mice are embryonic lethal between E8.5 to 10.5. Null embryos show gastrulation defects that induce a developmental block around E7.5.Pasini et al., 2007Pasini D. Bracken A.P. Hansen J.B. Capillo M. Helin K. The polycomb group protein Suz12 is required for embryonic stem cell differentiation.Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007; 27: 3769-3779Crossref PubMed Scopus (539) Google ScholarTet1Tet1Tet1 null ESCs have reduced 5hmC level and subtle changes in gene expression. They can self-renew and are pluripotent with skewed differentiation toward trophectoderm in vitro.Tet1 null mice are viable, fertile, and grossly normal, though some have a slightly smaller body size at birth.Dawlaty et al., 2011Dawlaty M.M. Ganz K. Powell B.E. Hu Y.C. Markoulaki S. Cheng A.W. Gao Q. Kim J. Choi S.W. Page D.C. Jaenisch R. Tet1 is dispensable for maintaining pluripotency and its loss is compatible with embryonic and postnatal development.Cell Stem Cell. 2011; 9: 166-175Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (396) Google ScholaresBAFBrg1Brg1-null ESCs show defects in self-renewal and pluripotency.Brg1 null mice are embryonic lethal at the peri-implantation stage.Bultman et al., 2000Bultman S. Gebuhr T. Yee D. La Mantia C. Nicholson J. Gilliam A. Randazzo F. Metzger D. Chambon P. Crabtree G. Magnuson T. A Brg1 null mutation in the mouse reveals functional differences among mammalian SWI/SNF complexes.Mol. Cell. 2000; 6: 1287-1295Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (675) Google Scholar, Ho et al., 2011Ho L. Miller E.L. Ronan J.L. Ho W.Q. Jothi R. Crabtree G.R. esBAF facilitates pluripotency by conditioning the genome for LIF/STAT3 signalling and by regulating polycomb function.Nat. Cell Biol. 2011; 13: 903-913Crossref PubMed Scopus (192) Google ScholarLSD1LSD1Lsd1 null ESCs have growth defects, cannot form embryoid bodies, and cannot properly silence ESC genes during differentiation.Lsd1 null mice are embryonic lethal before E7.5 with arrested embryonic development at or before E5.5. The egg cylinder failed to elongate and undergo gastrulation.Wang et al., 2007Wang J. Scully K. Zhu X. Cai L. Zhang J. Prefontaine G.G. Krones A. Ohgi K.A. Zhu P. Garcia-Bassets I. et al.Opposing LSD1 complexes function in developmental gene activation and repression programmes.Nature. 2007; 446: 882-887Crossref PubMed Scopus (428) Google Scholar, Wang et al., 2009aWang J. Hevi S. Kurash J.K. Lei H. Gay F. Bajko J. Su H. Sun W. Chang H. Xu G. et al.The lysine demethylase LSD1 (KDM1) is required for maintenance of global DNA methylation.Nat. Genet. 2009; 41: 125-129Crossref PubMed Scopus (606) Google Scholar, Whyte et al., 2012Whyte W.A. Bilodeau S. Orlando D.A. Hoke H.A. Frampton G.M. Foster C.T. Cowley S.M. Young R.A. Enhancer decommissioning by LSD1 during embryonic stem cell differentiation.Nature. 2012; 482: 221-225Crossref PubMed Scopus (422) Google Scholar Open table in a new tab The genetic functional data presented by these two papers provides an attractive model to explain important aspects of the role of NuRD in the pluripotency program. It should be noted that, like all models, this one does not explain all the existing data. In particular, analysis of animals and cells genetically engineered at PRC2 genes suggests that the story may not be entirely this simple (Table 1). Animals null for the PRC2 components Suz12, Eed, and Ezh2 show developmental defects at slightly later stages than animals lacking MBD3. In these models, development fails around or after the time of gastrulation, suggesting that these animals have some capacity for differentiation. In ESCs, PRC2 deficiency can lead to a much less severe block on differentiation than loss of MBD3, as Eed or Suz12 null ESCs can still form embryoid bodies, and in some cases differentiate into three germ layers and contribute to chimeras (Table 1). These data suggest that a model with NuRD acting solely as a mediator for PRC2-induced repression does not explain all the requirements for NuRD in this process. Repression of pluripotency genes is required for differentiation. Whyte et al. recently reported that LSD1, a histone H3K4/K9 demethylase, is required for ESC differentiation by decommissioning, or silencing, ESC-specific enhancers (Whyte et al., 2012Whyte W.A. Bilodeau S. Orlando D.A. Hoke H.A. Frampton G.M. Foster C.T. Cowley S.M. Young R.A. Enhancer decommissioning by LSD1 during embryonic stem cell differentiation.Nature. 2012; 482: 221-225Crossref PubMed Scopus (422) Google Scholar). They found that inhibition of LSD1 in ESCs through RNA interference or pharmacologic methods prevented the normal silencing of pluripotency genes such as Nanog and Sox2 under differentiation conditions, without affecting the upregulation of lineage markers. A genome-wide ChIP approach demonstrated that LSD1 occupies the enhancers and promoters of roughly 90% of actively transcribed and 2/3 of bivalent genes. Occupancy was noted at both promoter and enhancer regions, with peaks being higher at enhancer regions (Figure 2B). Focusing their attention on enhancer elements occupied by the core pluripotency transcription factors Oct4, Nanog, and Sox2, the authors found that inhibition of LSD1 blocked the removal of H3K4me1 at LSD1 occupied enhancer regions during differentiation. Thus, LSD1 demethylates H3K4me1 at ESC-specific enhancers during differentiation to facilitate repression of pluripotency genes, defining LSD1 as essential for decommissioning enhancers. Partially consistent with these findings, another study in human ESCs also found that LSD1-bound genes are highly enriched for those with bivalent domains and those occupied by Oct4 and Nanog (Adamo et al., 2011Adamo A. Sesé B. Boue S. Castaño J. Paramonov I. Barrero M.J. Izpisua Belmonte J.C. LSD1 regulates the balance between self-renewal and differentiation in human embryonic stem cells.Nat. Cell Biol. 2011; 13: 652-659Crossref PubMed Scopus (242) Google Scholar). However, in this case LSD1 and its demethylase activity were required to maintain ESC self-renewal and suppress differentiation into mesoendodermal lineages, possibly by reducing H3K4 methylation at its target promoters. The precise reason(s) for these discrepancies remain unclear, although human and murine ESCs do represent different pluripotent stem cells and require different mechanisms for self-renewal. Interestingly, Whyte et al. showed that LSD1 physically interacts with and co-occupies enhancer regions with the NuRD complex in ESCs (of approximately 5500 genes bound by Mi-2β, 4800 are also bound by LSD1), suggesting that LSD1 and NuRD have broad functional overlap (Whyte et al.,
What problem does this paper attempt to address?