Abstract:Four-dimensional (4D) flow assessment by MRI is becoming an attractive tool to assess hemodynamics in different applications of cardiac chambers, valves, and large thoracic and abdominal vessels as well as in neurovascular applications. Cardiac valvular flow evaluation by 4D flow has unique characteristics that differ from echocardiography and enable image acquisition without geometric assumptions, flow measurements with plane reformatting that account for valve plane motion during the cardiac cycle, simultaneous analysis of flow across all four valves, and advanced fluid biomechanics measurements such as turbulent kinetic energy, viscous energy loss rate, and wall shear stress. It is also advantageous for its simplicity in direct regurgitant volume assessment when compared with the conventional MRI method of indirect measurement, which involves two volumetric measurements and their subtraction. Good to excellent correlations between the 4D flow and conventional MRI techniques are reported in the literature. Despite these advantages, 4D flow image is a relatively novel technique and its image acquisition is still timeconsuming (up to 15 minutes) even when utilizing acceleration techniques that represent hurdles for clinical adoption. The SCMR consensus statement recommends parallel imaging (PI) as an image acquisition acceleration technique, but other approaches including compressed sensing (CS), nonCartesian trajectory techniques, and artificial intelligencebased cardiac MRI reconstruction have also been introduced. Examples of such approaches include k-adaptive-t autocalibrating reconstruction for Cartesian sampling (kat-ARC) and pseudospiral Cartesian sampling with random undersampling in time (PROUD) combined with CS reconstruction. The combination of acceleration techniques may effectively reduce scanning time but can introduce other impacts in terms of susceptibility to artifacts, image quality, and consistency of intra-cardiac flow quantifications. In this issue of Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Emrich et al studied the highly accelerated CS-based image acquisition in 4D flow imaging and validated it in comparison to the conventional technique of PI-based GeneRalized Autocalibrating Partial Parallel Acquisition (GRAPPA) for intra-cardiac valve flow assessment in 50 healthy volunteers in a prospective study. CS 4D flow data were undersampled using a spiral phyllotaxis subsampling pattern and the acceleration factors were set in 3 for GRAPPA and 7.7 for CS. All four intra-cardiac valve flow measurements and the diastolic function assessment of E/A and E/e’ were included in the validation effort. A significant acquisition time efficiency of 44% was achieved in CS-based acquisition but it underestimated flow with an average error of 17%. The underestimation was less than 10% for large forward volumes and net forward volumes. The authors conclude that highly accelerated 4D flow acquisition is feasible despite volume underestimation. The current study sheds light on the fact that optimal image acceleration is selected on the basis of a balance between scan time clinical feasibility and ideal data quality. The CS-based acceleration method is efficient in 4D flow imaging, considering its high-dimensional characteristics. Meanwhile, the possible underestimation associated with the highly accelerated image acquisition is a concern as presented in the current study. When utilizing a CS-based high acceleration rate of 7.7, the aortic 4D flow image scan time can be shortened substantially up to 2 min with the trade-off being the underestimation of peak velocities and peak flow generally within 13% when compared with the conventional PI-based methods. In the pediatric population, for example, the short scan time is a great advantage but underestimation needs to be avoided when a much smaller flow volume needs to be measured compared with adults. Accordingly, selecting the appropriate image acceleration strategy that fits the clinical situation is essential. The underestimation of the 4D flow is influenced by the temporal undersampling. In this context, temporal sparsity modification with increased incoherence may improve data quality, although its feasibility in 4D flow imaging needs further investigation. Some other remaining technical challenges are recognized such as temporal and spatial resolutions for the fine anatomy of coronary arteries and left atrial appendages, for

Analysis of Accelerated 4D Flow MRI in the Murine Aorta by Radial Acquisition and Compressed Sensing Reconstruction.

Optimization of 4D Flow MRI Velocity Field in the Aorta with Divergence-Free Smoothing.

Accelerated sequences of 4D flow MRI using GRAPPA and compressed sensing: A comparison against conventional MRI and computational fluid dynamics

Highly accelerated 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance using a pseudo-spiral Cartesian acquisition and compressed sensing reconstruction for carotid flow and wall shear stress

Highly accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI using compressed sensing: Performance at different acceleration factors in patients with aortic disease

Influence of Spatial Resolution and Compressed SENSE Acceleration Factor on Flow Quantification with 4D Flow MRI at 3 Tesla

Editorial for “Highly Accelerated Compressed Sensing 4D Flow for Intracardiac Flow Assessment”

Highly accelerated compressed sensing 4D flow MRI in congenital and acquired heart disease: comparison of aorta and main pulmonary artery flow parameters with conventional 4D flow MRI in children and young adults

Highly accelerated free-breathing real-time 2D flow imaging using compressed sensing and shared velocity encoding

Abdominal 4D flow MR imaging in a breath hold: combination of spiral sampling and dynamic compressed sensing for highly accelerated acquisition.

Coronary Flow Assessment Using Accelerated 4D Flow MRI With Respiratory Motion Correction

Combined free-running four-dimensional anatomical and flow magnetic resonance imaging with native contrast using Synchronization of Neighboring Acquisitions by Physiological Signals

Motion-resolved real-time 4D flow MRI with low-rank and subspace modeling

Accelerated 4D‐flow MRI with 3‐point encoding enabled by machine learning

Automated Quantitative Extraction and Analysis of 4D flow Patterns in the Ascending Aorta: An intraindividual comparison at 1.5 T and 3 T

Multipoint 5D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - accelerated cardiac- and respiratory-motion resolved mapping of mean and turbulent velocities

Quality Control for 4D Flow MR Imaging

Optimizing encoding strategies for 4D Flow MRI of mean and turbulent flow

Kat-ARC accelerated 4D flow CMR: clinical validation for transvalvular flow and peak velocity assessment

Observation of intracranial artery and venous sinus hemodynamics using compressed sensing-accelerated 4D flow MRI: performance at different acceleration factors

5D Flow MRI: A Fully Self-gated, Free-running Framework for Cardiac and Respiratory Motion-resolved 3D Hemodynamics