Abstract:We read with interest the article by Sung et al.1Kwon J. Sung K.R. Han S. et al.Subclassification of primary angle closure using anterior segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopic parameters.Ophthalmology. 2017; 124: 1039-1047Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar In this observational study, the authors concluded that the most distinct difference between the 2 subgroups in the cluster analysis was trabecular–ciliary process angle (TCA) and that the position of the ciliary body is important in subclassifying primary angle closure. However, there are several limitations that may affect the results. First, in the study, the authors reported that gonioscopy and image analysis using ImageJ was all conducted by a single researcher. These 2 measurements, however, both can be influenced by observers' subjectivity. To reduce influence from observers' subjectivity, we have to repeat measurement by a second or even a third observer, and take their mean value as the final data. Also, only chamber angle of temporal and nasal quadrants were captured. Superior and inferior quadrants were not recorded, which may also cause bias of data. Second, in Figure 1B,1Kwon J. Sung K.R. Han S. et al.Subclassification of primary angle closure using anterior segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopic parameters.Ophthalmology. 2017; 124: 1039-1047Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar the superior surface of ciliary process overlaps with inferior surface of iris. In this situation, it is hard to measure the TCA because one cannot define the boundary of superior surface of ciliary process. Third, in the discussion, the percentage of intraocular pressure reduction was significantly lower in the cluster with a smaller TCA, suggesting that laser peripheral iridotomy is less effective in this group of eyes. Actually, TCA in this study was measured after laser peripheral iridotomy. A change in TCA may be caused by laser peripheral iridotomy. So it may be inappropriate to say, “The percentage of [intraocular pressure] reduction was significantly lower in the cluster with a smaller TCA.” Subclassification of Primary Angle Closure Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Biomicroscopic ParametersOphthalmologyVol. 124Issue 7PreviewTo classify eyes with primary angle closure (PAC) in terms of the features visualized using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Full-Text PDF ReplyOphthalmologyVol. 124Issue 10PreviewWe greatly appreciate the interest Dr Li has shown in our article.1 We agree with the first comment that examinations can be influenced by observers' subjectivity. However, examinations can also be influenced by interexaminer variability if multiple examiners perform the analysis. Lin et al2 reported that interexaminer measurements related to the ciliary process were variable and recommended that measurement should be performed by the same observer. Hence, both approaches have pros and cons. Our previous study showed excellent intraexaminer intraclass correlation coefficient values between 0.933 and 0.951 using anterior segment OCT images. Full-Text PDF

Automatic Classification of Anterior Chamber Angle Based on Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Images

Automatic Anterior Chamber Angle Classification Using Deep Learning System and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Images

Cost-effective broad learning-based ultrasound biomicroscopy with 3D reconstruction for ocular anterior segmentation

Angle-closure assessment in anterior segment OCT images via deep learning

Classifications of Qualitative Characteristics on Angle Configurations via Ultrasound Biomicroscopy in Acute Primary Angle Closure

Anterior Chamber Angle Classification in Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Images Using Hybrid Attention Based Pyramidal Convolutional Network.

Gonioscopy and Ultrasound Biomicroscopy in the Detection of Angle Closure in Patients with Shallow Anterior Chamber

Automatic measurement of anterior chamber angle parameters in AS-OCT images using deep learning

Novel Approach for Anterior Chamber Angle Analysis

Comparison of ultrasound biomicroscopy and gonioscopy for detection of narrow anterior vchamber angles on primary angle-closure glaucoma

Open-Narrow-Synechiae Anterior Chamber Angle Classification in AS-OCT Sequences

Evaluation of the Agreement Between Pentacam and Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Measurements of Anterior Chamber Depth in Chinese Patients with Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma

Volumetric Parameters-Based Differentiation of Narrow Angle from Open Angle and Classification of Angle Configurations: an SS-OCT Study

Open-Appositional-Synechial Anterior Chamber Angle Classification in AS-OCT Sequences

Imaging of the anterior chamber by ultrasound biomicroscopy before and after cataract surgery in eyes with primary angle closure glaucoma

Automatic Angle-Closure Glaucoma Screening Based on the Localization of Scleral Spur in Anterior Segment OCT.

Automated classification of angle-closure mechanisms based on anterior segment optical coherence tomography images via deep learning

Automated anterior segment OCT image analysis for Angle Closure Glaucoma mechanisms classification

Re: Kwon Et Al.: Subclassification of Primary Angle Closure Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Biomicroscopic Parameters (ophthalmology. 2017;124:1039-1047).

Anterior Chamber Angles Classification In Anterior Segment Oct Images Via Multi-Scale Regions Convolutional Neural Networks

Comparison of Ultrasound Biomicroscopy and Spectral-Domain Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in Evaluation of Anterior Segment after Laser Peripheral Iridotomy.