An Experimental Study of Butene Isomers and 1,3-Butadiene Ignition Delay Times at Elevated Pressures
Yang Li,Eoin O’Connor,Chong-wen Zhou,H. Curran
2015-01-01
Abstract:In this study, rapid compression machine (RCM) and shock tube (ST) ignition delay time measurements have been made for three butene isomers (iso-butene, 1-butene and trans-2-butene) for fuel/air mixtures at equivalence ratios of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 over a wide temperature range, and across engine relevant pressures, ranging from 10 to 50 atm. Some ignition delay time measurements of 1,3-butadiene have also been obtained at both low and elevated pressures. The results for the butene isomers show that, for several pressures and equivalence ratios, the ST and RCM results are in excellent agreement at overlapping temperatures and are very complementary to one another. A negative temperature coefficient (NTC) behaviour was not observed for any of the butene isomers at any of the conditions studied. At relatively low temperature conditions (≤ 1000 K), ignition delay time decreases with increasing equivalence ratio, while at relatively high temperature conditions (≥ 1000 K), there appears to be no dependence on equivalence ratio under the conditions investigated. It was found that reactivity increases with increasing pressure for all fuels. 1-Butene is the most reactive, followed by trans-2-butene, with iso-butene being the slowest to ignite at the same conditions of temperature and pressure. As to 1,3-butadiene ignition, we can see that reactivity increases with pressure at all equivalence ratios and at all levels of dilution presented. As the pressure increases, the relative concentration of the reactants increases, thereby increasing the overall reactivity. These experimental results will be used to validate detailed chemical kinetic models for all these fuels studied. Corresponding author: y.li9@nuigalway.ie Proceedings of the European Combustion Meeting 2015 Introduction The isomeric structure of a fuel can fundamentally affect its combustion chemistry and consequently the nature of its practical applications. For example, the research octane numbers of the heptane isomers vary from 0 for n-heptane to 112 for 2,2,3-trimethylbutane [1]. Butene (C4H8), being the smallest alkene with isomeric structures, is a common component in many practical fuels, particularly liquid petroleum gas. Compared to larger alkenes, it has the essential features of the double bond variation with the smallest number of isomers, and its four isomers are all gaseous at room temperature and at moderate pressures. Experimental studies have been performed on various aspects of butene combustion, including pyrolysis and oxidation, measurements of ignition delay times, speciation, flame speed, ignition temperature, etc., shown in Tables 1–3. However, few studied have been specifically concerned with the effects of isomeric fuel structures. In addition, while kinetic models have been developed for the combustion process of specific butene isomers, only a few have been reported for all of the butene isomers. This is possibly due to the paucity of experimental studies of isomeric effects at identical conditions. Most recently, Schenk et al. [2] studied premixed low-pressure (40 mbar) flat argon-diluted (25%) flames of the three butene isomers (1-, trans-2-, and iso-butene) under fuel-rich (Φ = 1.7) conditions. It was the first detailed flame study of butene isomers, performed under fuel-rich conditions. The isomer-specific species information and the quantitative mole fraction profiles of more than 30 stable and radical species measured by a newly developed analytical combination of highresolution in situ molecular-beam mass spectrometry (MBMS) and in situ gas chromatography (GC) were used to validate and improve the subset of C4 kinetics in a general hydrocarbon oxidation mechanism based on the work of Hoyermann et al. [3]. In addition, Zhao et al. [4] developed a high temperature kinetic model for the four butene isomers (1-, trans-2-, cis-2and iso-butene) based on validation against the laminar flame speeds and non-premixed counterflow ignition temperatures at pressures of 2, 5 and 10 atm. Furthermore, the critical reaction paths for butene isomer oxidation during ignition, particularly the allylic H-atom abstraction by OH radical with isomeric butenes, the OH radical induced oxidation reactions of butenes, and reactions between butenyl radicals and HO2/O2, etc., were systematically considered with updated rate coefficients from ab initio calculations and kinetic theories. As the simplest conjugated hydrocarbon, 1,3butadiene (1,3-C4H6) can also provide a first step towards understanding the role of complex alkenes in combustion and, in particular, an understanding of the contribution of 1,3-butadiene towards soot formation. For example, in diesel engines, practical hydrocarbon fuels do not actually contain 1,3-butadiene, but it is a stable intermediate species which is produced in large quantities during the combustion of olefins (which constitute several percent in gasoline) [5, 6]. It is the oxidation of 1,3-butadiene that can lead to the formation of benzene, which is central to the formation of soot [5]. Literature data of 1,3-butadiene oxidation is summarized in Table 4. Most recently, Laskin et al. [7] examined hightemperature kinetics of 1,3-butadiene oxidation with detailed kinetic modeling. To facilitate model validation, flow reactor experiments were carried out for 1,3butadiene pyrolysis and oxidation over the temperature range 1035–1185 K and at atmospheric pressure, extending the literature data. Libby et al. [8] presented hydroxyl (OH) radical concentration-time histories and ignition delay times measured in dilute 1,3butadiene/O2/argon mixtures after reflected shock waves. Temperature ranged from 1230 K to 1890 K at pressures from 1.5–7.5 atm with fuel concentrations from 250–5000 ppm at φ in the range 0.25–2.0. It was the first shock tube study of 1,3-butadiene oxidation that included quantitative measurements of a radical speciestime histories. Moreover, experimental results were compared to the predictions of four different 1,3butadiene oxidation mechanisms in the literature. Zheng et al. [9] investigated the ignition temperatures of nitrogen-diluted 1,3-butadiene by heated air in counterflow at pressures up to 5 atm and pressureweighted strain rates from 100 to 250 s. Experimental data were compared with computational results using the mechanism of Laskin et al. [7] which was then simplified to skeletal and reduced mechanisms. Despite their importance, there is a lack of experimental data available in the literature for both the butene isomers, and 1,3-butadiene at low and intermediate temperatures (700–1200 K), and at high pressures (≥ 10 atm). From this point of view, ignition delay time measurements have been made for three butene isomers (iso-, 1and trans-2-butene) for fuel/air mixtures at equivalence ratios of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 in a wide temperature range, and across engine relevant pressures, ranging from 10 to 50 atm. Ignition delay time measurements of 1,3-butadiene have also been made at both low and elevated pressures. Table 1. List of Experimental Data of Iso-butene at High-Temperature. No. Reactor Φ Diluent / % T / K p / atm References 1 Shock Tube 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.5, 0.8, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 80.8–98.8 (Ar) 1200–2000 2.2, 3.5, 3.6, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6 Curran [29] 2 Shock Tube 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 74.45–98.5 (Ar) 1230–1930 9.5–10.5 Bauge et al. [19] 3 Shock Tube 0.125, 0.5, 0.6, 1.0, 2.0, ∞ 93.0–99.0 (Ar) 1000–1800 1.0–2.7 Yasunaga et al. [14] 4 Shock Tube ∞ 1055–1325 2.92–4.0 Bradley et al. [20] 5 Shock Tube 99.0–99.25 (Ar) 1000–1180 2.5–3.0 Tsang et al. [21] 6 Shock Tube ∞ 90.0–98.0 (Kr) 900–2300 7–400 / torr Santhanam et al. [26] 7 JSR 3.0, 6.0 83.3–86.95 (He) 833–913 1.0 Bauge et al. [3] 8 JSR 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 95.35–99.4 790–1240 1.0 Dagaut et al. [22] 9 Flow Reactor ∞ 96.0 (Ar) 900–1900 3–12 / torr Zhang et al. [27] 10 Flow Reactor 1080 1.0 Brezinsky et al. [28] 11 Flame Burner 1.7 25.0 (Ar) 2046 0.04 Schenk et al. [2] 12 Flame Burner 0.225 9.8 (Ar) 1720 0.04 Dias et al. [30] 13 Counterflow 0.7–1.7 74.6–77.1 2321 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10 Davis et al. [31] 14 Counterflow 1000–1300 1.0–5.0 Zhao et al. [4] Table 2. List of Experimental Data of 1-Butene at High-Temperature. No. Reactor Φ Diluent / % T / K p / atm References 1 Shock Tube 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 86.0–96.0 (Ar) 1200–1670 6.6–8.9 Heyberger et al. [15] 2 JSR 0.4, 4.0 99.9 900–1200 1.5–10 Heyberger et al. [15] 3 JSR 0.15, 1.0, 4.0 90.0–93.85 900–1200 1.0–10.0 Chakir et al. [16] 4 Flow Reactor ∞ 96.0 (Ar) 900–1900 3–12 / torr Zhang et al. [27] 5 Flame Burner 1.7 25.0 (Ar) 2204 0.04 Schenk et al. [2] 6 Counterflow 0.7–1.7 74.6–77.1 2329 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10 Davis et al. [31] 7 Counterflow 1000–1300 1.0–5.0 Zhao et al. [4] Table 3. List of Experimental Data of Trans-2-butene at High-Temperature. No. Reactor Φ Diluent / % T / K p / atm References 1 JSR 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 94.0 900–1450 1.0 Fenard et al. [17] 2 Combustion bomb 0.8–1.4 75.3–76.8 300 1.0 Fenard et al. [17] 3 Flow Reactor ∞ 96.0 (Ar) 900–1900 3–12 / torr Zhang et al. [27] 4 Flame Burner 1.7 25.0 (Ar) 2218 0.04 Schenk et al. [2] 5 Counterflow 0.7–1.7 74.6–77.1 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10 Zhao et al. [4] 6 Counterflow 1000–1300 1.0–5.0 Zhao et al. [4] Table 4. List of Experimental Data of 1,3-Butadiene at High-Temperature. No. Reactor Φ Diluent T / K p / atm References 1 Shock Tube 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 96.75–99.425 (Ar) 1230–1890 1.7, 3.8 Libby et al. [8] 2 Shock Tube 0.69, 1.38 85.0–95.0 (Ar) 1200–1700 8.5–10 Fournet et al. [23] 3 Shock Tube ∞ 99.825 (Ar) 1200–1800 6.5 Colket et al. [24] 4 Shock Tube ∞ 99.5 (Ar) 1200–1800 1.4–2.2 Hidaka et al. [25] 5 Flow Reactor 0.55, 1.0, 1.62, 1.63, 4.7, ∞ 98.46–99.74 1035–1185 1.0 Laskin et al. [7] 6 Flow Reactor 1.18, 1.65 99.231–99.38 1125 1.0 Brezinsky et al. [28] 7 Counterflow ∞ 94.1 1020–1220 1.0–5.0 Zheng et al. [9] 8 Counterflow 0.7–1.7 2381 1.0 Davis et al. [31] Experiments The high-pressure shock tube (HPST) used in this study consists of a stainless steel tube of 8.76 m in length, with an internal diamet