Abstract:Background: The hand is crucial for carrying out activities of daily living as well as social interaction. Functional use of the upper limb is affected in up to 55% to 75% of stroke survivors 3 to 6 months after stroke. Rehabilitation can help restore function, and several rehabilitation devices have been designed to improve hand function. However, access to these devices is compromised in people with more severe loss of function. Objective: In this study, we aimed to observe stroke survivors with poor hand function interacting with a range of commonly used hand rehabilitation devices. Methods: Participants were engaged in an 8-week rehabilitation intervention at a technology-enriched rehabilitation gym. The participants spent 50-60 minutes of the 2-hour session in the upper limb section at least twice a week. Each participant communicated their rehabilitation goals, and an Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) was used to measure and categorize hand function as poor (scores of 0-9), moderate (scores of 10-56), or good (score of 57). Participants were observed during their interactions with 3 hand-based rehabilitation devices that focused on hand rehabilitation: the GripAble, NeuroBall, and Semi-Circular Peg Board. Observations of device interactions were recorded for each session. Results: A total of 29 participants were included in this study, of whom 10 (34%) had poor hand function, 17 (59%) had moderate hand function, and 2 (7%) had good hand function. There were no differences in the age and years after stroke among participants with poor hand function and those with moderate (P=.06 and P=.09, respectively) and good (P=.37 and P=.99, respectively) hand function. Regarding the ability of the 10 participants with poor hand function to interact with the 3 hand-based rehabilitation devices, 2 (20%) participants with an ARAT score greater than 0 were able to interact with the devices, whereas the other 8 (80%) who had an ARAT score of 0 could not. Their inability to interact with these devices was clinically examined, and the reason was determined to be a result of either the presence of (1) muscle tone or stiffness or (2) muscle weakness. Conclusions: Not all stroke survivors with impairments in their hands can make use of currently available rehabilitation technologies. Those with an ARAT score of 0 cannot actively interact with hand rehabilitation devices, as they cannot carry out the hand movement necessary for such interaction. The design of devices for hand rehabilitation should consider the accessibility needs of those with poor hand function.

Relative handgrip strength as a vitality measure in US stroke survivors

A Home-Based Functional Hand-Extremity Assessment System for Stroke Rehabilitation

Hand Grip Strength and Cognitive Function among Elderly Cancer Survivors

Validation of real-world actigraphy to capture post-stroke motor recovery.

Challenges of Estimating Accurate Prevalence of Arm Weakness Early After Stroke

Self-perceived upper extremity motor function predicts health-related quality of life in chronic stroke survivors

Measuring Exercise Self-Efficacy After Stroke: Validity and Reliability of Current Measures

Handgrip strength is associated with risks of new-onset stroke and heart disease: results from 3 prospective cohorts

Wearable-Based Kinematic Analysis of Upper-Limb Movements During Daily Activities Could Provide Insights into Stroke Survivors' Motor Ability

Prevalence of Arm Weakness, Pre-Stroke Outcomes and Other Post-Stroke Impairments Using Routinely Collected Clinical Data on an Acute Stroke Unit

Understanding the relationship between social risk factors and functional limitation among stroke survivors in the US

Relationship among grip strength, functional outcomes, and work performance following hand trauma

Assessment of Impaired Finger Independence of Stroke Survivors: A Preliminary study

Standard maximal grip/pinch force test in stroke patients

Stroke Survivors' Interaction With Hand Rehabilitation Devices: Observational Study

Decreased Handgrip Strength is Associated With Impairments in Each Autonomous Living Task for Aging Adults in the United States

Characteristics of the severely impaired hand in survivors of stroke with chronic impairments

Survivors of Chronic Stroke Experience Continued Impairment of Dexterity But Not Strength in the Nonparetic Upper Limb

Weak Grip Strength and Cognition Predict Functional Limitation in Older Europeans

Kinetic Measurements of Hand Motor Impairments after Mild to Moderate Stroke Using Grip Control Tasks.

Post-Stroke Impairments of Manual Dexterity and Finger Proprioception: Their Contribution to Upper Limb Activity Capacity