Abstract:Unwanted memories, such as emotionally negative, can be intentionally suppressed through voluntary control in humans. Memory suppression is thought to be mediated by the interplay of a chain of neurocognitive processes. However, empirical data in support of this notion is lacking. Using high-temporal resolution event-related potential (ERP) technique, we investigated the time course of ERPs associated with suppression of negative and neutral memories in a Think/No-Think paradigm in young, healthy participants. Results showed that participants had greater difficulty in suppressing emotionally negative memories than neutral ones. ERPs and source analyses demonstrated that memory suppression processing for negative and neutral memories were generally associated with changes during early components of a time window of 70–260ms, such as P1 and N2, mainly at the right inferior frontal gyrus and occipital lobe; suppression of aversive memories was associated with two major late ERP components between 380 and 800ms, with significantly smaller later negativity (LN) but larger late parietal positivity (LPP), primarily at the right medial and superior frontal gyri. These results suggest that differences in early components may reflect early stages of suppression processing including visual awareness, attention reallocation, and executive processing. Differences in late components between suppression of aversive and neutral memories may reflect a process of down-regulating conscious recollection of memory representations supported by prefrontal and parietal networks. A less effective control of this process, as evidenced by smaller LN and larger LPP, may explain the fact that emotionally negative memories were harder to be suppressed. Altogether, these findings suggest that suppression of aversive memories requires down-regulation of late conscious recollection, which can be dissociated from early visual and attention processing in memory suppression.

Forgetting Unrelated Episodic Memories Through Suppression-Induced Amnesia.

Inducing forgetting of unwanted memories through subliminal reactivation

Inducing Amnesia for Unwanted Memories through Subliminal Reactivation

Retrieval suppression induced forgetting on 1-week-old consolidated episodic memories

Amnesia in healthy people via hippocampal inhibition: A new forgetting mechanism

Reconsidering Unconscious Persistence: Suppressing Unwanted Memories Reduces Their Indirect Expression in Later Thoughts

Observing the suppression of individual aversive memories from conscious awareness

Suppression of Aversive Memories Associates with Changes in Early and Late Stages of Neurocognitive Processing

Reduced hippocampal-cortical connectivity during memory suppression predicts the ability to forget unwanted memories

Suppression-Induced Forgetting as a Model for Repression

Memory consolidation of attended information is optional: Comment on Jiang et al. (2016).

Intentional forgetting needs intentional remembering.

Active suppression prevents the return of threat memory in humans

Do we actively inhibit recently attended but no longer relevant information

Suppressing the Maintenance of Information in Working Memory Alters Long-term Memory Traces

Emotional and non-emotional memories are suppressible under direct suppression instructions

Accessing without remembering: memory consolidation of information at the focus of awareness is optional

Suppress to Forget: The Effect of a Mindfulness-Based Strategy during an Emotional Item-Directed Forgetting Paradigm

Stimulating the medial prefrontal cortex disrupts inhibitory control over memory by modulating frontal and parietal brain regions

Neural Underpinnings of a Two-Phase Memory Suppression Process in the Neural Response to Self-Related and Observed Perspective Views

Gone but Not Forgotten: The Transient Nature of Retrieval-Induced Forgetting