A New Scoring System for Predicting the Outcome of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients without Microvascular Invasion-a Large-Scale Multicentre Study

Ju-Xian Sun,Zhe Yang,Jia-Yi Wu,Jie Shi,Hong-Ming Yu,Mao-Lin Yan,Shu-Sen Zheng,Shu-Qun Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.02.007
IF: 3.842
2024-02-01
HPB
Abstract:BACKGROUND: The prognosis of HCC patients without MVI (so called M0) is highly heterogeneous and the need for adjuvant therapy is still controversial.METHODS: Patients with HCC with M0 who underwent liver resection (LR) or liver transplantation (LT) as an initial therapy were included. The Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (EHBH)-M0 score was developed from a retrospective cohort to form the training cohort. The classification which was developed using multivariate cox regression analysis was externally validated.RESULTS: The score was developed using the following factors: α-fetoprotein level, tumour diameter, liver cirrhosis, total bilirubin, albumin and aspartate aminotransferase. The score differentiated two groups of M0 patients (≤3, >3 points) with distinct long-term prognoses outcomes (median overall survival (OS), 98.0 vs. 46.0 months; p < 0.001). The predictive accuracy of the score was greater than the other commonly used staging systems for HCC. And for M0 patients with a higher score underwent LR. Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) was effective to prolong OS.CONCLUSIONS: The EHBH M0 scoring system was more accurate in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients with M0 after LR or LT. Adjuvant therapy is recommended for HCC patients who have a higher score.
gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?