Abstract:We present forecasts for constraints on the Hu and Sawicki f(R) modified gravity model using realistic mock data representative of future cluster and weak lensing surveys. We create mock thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect selected cluster samples for SPT-3G and CMB-S4 and the corresponding weak gravitational lensing data from next-generation weak-lensing (ngWL) surveys like Euclid and Rubin. We employ a state-of-the-art Bayesian likelihood approach that includes all observational effects and systematic uncertainties to obtain constraints on the f(R) gravity parameter log10|fR0| . In this analysis we vary the cosmological parameters [Ωm,Ωνh2,h,As,ns,log10|fR0|] , which allows us to account for possible degeneracies between cosmological parameters and f(R) modified gravity. The analysis accounts for f(R) gravity via its effect on the halo mass function which is enhanced on cluster mass scales compared to the expectations within general relativity (GR). Assuming a fiducial GR model, the upcoming cluster dataset SPT−3G×ngWL is expected to obtain an upper limit of log10|fR0|<−5.95 at 95% credibility, which significantly improves upon the current best bounds. The CMB−S4×ngWL dataset is expected to improve this even further to log10|fR0|<−6.23 . Furthermore, f(R) gravity models with log10|fR0|≥−6 , which have larger numbers of clusters, would be distinguishable from GR with both datasets. We also report degeneracies between log10|fR0| and Ωm as well as σ8 for log10|fR0|>−6 and log10|fR0|>−5 respectively. Our forecasts indicate that future cluster abundance studies of f(R) gravity will enable substantially improved constraints that are competitive with other cosmological probes. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.123503 Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Open access publication funded by the Max Planck Society. Published by the American Physical Society

Can $f(R)$ gravity relieve $H_0$ and $\sigma_8$ tensions?

Can $f(R)$ gravity relieve $H_0$ and $σ_8$ tensions?

Can f(R) gravity relieve $$H_0$$ H 0 and $$\sigma _8$$ σ 8 tensions?

Can f ( R ) gravity relieve H_0 and σ _8 tensions?

Can F(t) Gravity Resolve the H0 Tension?

Solving both $H_0$ and $\sigma_8$ tensions in $f(T)$ gravity

Testing $f(R)$ Gravity from Cosmic Shear Measurements

Constraining $f(R)$ gravity using future galaxy cluster abundance and weak-lensing mass calibration datasets

Constraints on $f(R)$ gravity from tSZE-selected SPT galaxy clusters and weak lensing mass calibration from DES and HST

Constraining models of $f(R)$ gravity with Planck and WiggleZ power spectrum data

Investigating the Hubble Tension and $σ_8$ Discrepancy in f(Q) Cosmology

Observational constraints on a modified-gravity model with an exponential function of the curvature using the expansion history, the RSD, and the Pantheon$+$SH0ES data

New late-time constraints on $f(R)$ gravity

Solving Both H0 and Σ8 Tensions in F(t) Gravity

Cosmographic view on the $H_0$ and $σ_8$ tensions

New Observational Constraints Onf(r) Gravity from Cosmic Chronometers

Growth of structures using redshift space distortion in $f(T)$ Cosmology

Constraining gravity using future galaxy cluster abundance and weak-lensing mass calibration datasets

Reconstructing $f(R)$ gravity from viscous cosmology constrained by observations

Investigating the Hubble tension and σ 8 discrepancy in f(Q) cosmology

Galaxy-galaxy lensing data: $f(T)$ gravity challenges General Relativity