Institutional engineering in new democracies

Jorge Heine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvhktjv1.7

2005-01-01

Abstract:The “Third Wave” of democratisation, which most observers would agree started in Portugal in 1974 and later made considerable headway in Southern Europe, Latin America, East Asia, Central and Eastern Europe, and Southern Africa, is still very much on course and has arguably been one of the key driving forces of political change over the past three decades. The number of countries under democratic rule is much higher today than it was in the midseventies–yet this process has by no means been one of steady progress. Rather, the story of democratisation is one of advances and setbacks, of triumphs and defeats.What makes for successful democratisation? A long list of studies on the breakdown of democratic regimes, of the subsequent transition from authoritarian rule, and the ensuing consolidation of democratic institutions makes up a rich and varied literature with many insights on this key political process. Yet, a little over a decade after the last big “outburst” of the Third Wave, the one that took place in the late eighties (mostly in Central and Eastern Europe, but also elsewhere) the time may be right to ask a somewhat different question. What makes democratisation succeed? Country case studies and regional generalisations have been at the heart of many transition studies. So has path analysis. However, a different approach may be needed to gain new insights into the building blocks of democratisation that works and to theorise about them. What are the conditions for this process to become self-sustaining?