Air Quality During COVID-19 Lockdown in the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta: Two Different Responsive Mechanisms to Emission Reductions in China
Nan Wang,Jiawei Xu,Chenglei Pei,Rong Tang,Derong Zhou,Yanning Chen,Mei Li,Xuejiao Deng,Tao Deng,Xin Huang,Aijun Ding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c08383
2021-04-02
Abstract:Despite the large reduction in anthropogenic activities due to the outbreak of COVID-19, air quality in China has witnessed little improvement and featured great regional disparities. Here, by combining observational data and simulations, this work aims to understand the diverse air quality response in two city clusters, Yangtze River Delta region (YRD) and Pearl River Delta region (PRD), China. Though there was a noticeable drop in primary pollutants in both the regions, differently, the maximum daily 8 h average ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) soared by 20.6–76.8% in YRD but decreased by 15.5–28.1% in PRD. In YRD, nitrogen oxide (NOx) reductions enhanced O<sub>3</sub> accumulation and hence increased secondary aerosol formation. Such an increment in secondary organic and inorganic aerosols under stationary weather reached up to 36.4 and 10.2%, respectively, which was further intensified by regional transport. PRD was quite the opposite. The emission reductions benefited PRD air quality, while regional transport corresponded to an increase of 17.3 and 9.3% in secondary organic and inorganic aerosols, respectively. Apart from meteorology, the discrepancy in O<sub>3</sub>–VOCs–NOx relationships determined the different O<sub>3</sub> responses, indicating that future emission control shall be regionally specific, instead of one-size-fits-all cut. Overall, the importance of regionally coordinated and balanced control strategy for multiple pollutants is highly emphasized.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c08383?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c08383</a>.WRF-Chem emissions and scenario setting; spatial distribution of O3–NOx–VOCs sensitivities; spatial distribution of nighttime light index and the locations of urban and suburb monitoring sites; spatial distribution of averaged PM<sub>2.5</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>MDA8h during the PRE and the LOCK; synoptic weather analysis; O<sub>3</sub>–VOCs–NOx sensitive regime; comparison of PM<sub>2.5</sub> components during PRE and LOCK period in Guangzhou and Nanjing; classification of air flow based on LPDM calculated retroplumes in PRD and YRD; introduction of monitoring instruments used in this work; configuration of WRF-Chem model; averaged model performance of O<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, and O<sub>3</sub> in YRD and PRD (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.est.0c08383/suppl_file/es0c08383_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental