Tertiary prevention strategies for micrometastatic lymph node cervical cancer: A systematic review and a prototype of an adapted model of care

Marcin Śniadecki,Benedetta Guani,Paulina Jaworek,Dagmara Klasa-Mazurkiewicz,Katia Mahiou,Karolina Mosakowska,Alessandro Buda,Patryk Poniewierza,Olga Piątek,Adrien Crestani,Maria Stasiak,Vincent Balaya,Oliwia Musielak,Luiza Piłat,Karolina Maliszewska,Cynthia Aristei,Paweł Guzik,Szymon Wojtylak,Marcin Liro,Thomas Gaillard,Roman Kocian,Anna Gołąbiewska,Zuzanna Chmielewska,Dariusz Wydra
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104329
IF: 6.625
2024-05-01
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Abstract:PURPOSE: We found a need for balancing the application of clinical guidelines and tailored approaches to follow-up of cervical cancer (CC) patients in the lymph node micrometastatic (MICs) setting. This review aimed to determine the current knowledge of management of MIC-positive CC cases.METHODOLOGY: We addressed prognostic and risk of recurrence monitoring impacts associated with MIC+ cases. The electronic databases for literature and relevant articles were analysed.RESULTS: Fifteen studies, (4882 patients), were included in our systematic review. While the results show that MICs significantly worsen prognosis in early CC. A tertiary prevention algorithm for low volume lymph node disease may stratify follow-up according to the burden of nodal disease and provide data that helps improve follow-up performance.CONCLUSION: MICs worsen prognosis and should be managed as suggested by the algorithm. However, this algorithm must be externally validated. The clinical impact of isolated tumor cells (ITC) remains unclear.
oncology,hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?