Research on the Evolution Trend of Group Psychological Security Risks Under Public Health Emergencies: Mining and Analysis Based on Social Media Data
Yu Gao,Haiyan Liu,Yuechi Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s455112
IF: 3.974
2024-04-30
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Yu Gao, 1 Haiyan Liu, 2 Yuechi Sun 2 1 School of Psychology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, People's Republic of China; 2 School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Haiyan Liu, School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 29 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100083, People's Republic of China, Email Background: In the digital age, people's attitudes and psychological security towards public health emergencies will be shared. Similar or identical psychological security states are prone to clustering and differentiation, while differentiated group psychological security is more prone to polarization, leading to group psychological security risks and then posing a threat to social stability and national security. However, existing studies mostly use qualitative analysis methods to study group emotional risks. There are still limitations in the study of dynamics of group psychological security risks through mining real data of social media. Purpose: The study aims to use intelligent analysis methods to understand how group psychological security risks dynamically change. Methods: The study draws on text sentiment analysis, Markov chains and time series analysis to construct a framework for the evolution of group psychological security risks. Based on this framework, text data was crawled on Sina Weibo platform, mainly consisting of posts during public health emergencies (March 1st to June 30th, 2022) in Shanghai, and a psychological security lexicon in the field of public health emergencies was constructed. This laid the foundation for identifying the tendencies, intensity, and transitions of individual text psychological security, and then exploring the evolution trend of group psychological security risks. Results: Compared with the generation and reduction periods, group psychological security risks are more likely to occur during the outbreak and recovery periods, and the intensity level is also higher. The overall intensity of group psychological security risks shows an evolution trend of first increasing, then decreasing, and then increasing again. Conclusion: The paper provides an opportunity to explore the dynamics of psychological security in the digital space. Meanwhile, we call on the government and relevant management departments to pay more attention to the group psychological security risks formed during the outbreak and recovery periods of public health emergencies, and take corresponding measures in a timely manner to guide the public to transform the extreme psychological security state into the normal psychological security state, in order to prevent and resolve group psychological security risks, promote social stability and national security. Keywords: group psychological security risks, psychological security lexicon, machine learning, evolution trend Psychological security (also known as mixed psychological security) refers to public subjective response to internal and external environmental stimuli, or can be seen as a kind of emotional experience, 1 which conforms to the bivariate model and includes both security and insecurity. 2 Group psychological security includes both group security and group insecurity, which are obtained by aggregating individual level psychological security to the group level. With the development and expansion of online social media platforms, social media has become an indispensable part of public daily life, and has also provided channels for the rapid dissemination of information related to public health emergencies and the emergence and evolution of public diversified emotions. 3–5 For example, in the outbreak of the new coronavirus epidemic in 2020, social media platforms have become the main battlefield for hundreds of millions of Weibo users to obtain epidemic information, and also the gathering place for hundreds of millions of Weibo users to express their psychological security. However, after public with similar or identical psychological security states gather, it is easy to trigger group psychological security differentiation, and the differentiated group psychological security is more prone to polarization (that is, excessive group security or excessive group insecurity), 6,7 inducing group psychological security risks. For example, excessive group security can easily lead to group slackness, numbness, and apathy, and even inability to respond rationally in crisis situations, further hiding risks. Excessive group insecurity can easily lead to group panic, group contradictions and conflicts, and even outb -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary