Tensions Within the Changing Chinese Higher Education System

David A. Stanfield,Yukiko Shimmi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-010-0112-0
2010-01-01
Frontiers of Education in China
Abstract:The processes of "massification" and systemic change in the Chinese higher education system are closely related.Of the two, systemic change has far deeper implications.Comprised of four academic papers, this special issue of Frontiers of Education in China might be seen as a condensed version of a research project led by Professor Ruth Hayhoe, and presented in the book Portraits of 21st Century Chinese Universities: In the Move to Mass Higher Education.It might also be seen as an alternative portrait of China's university sector.What is my reason for saying this?Although the authors of the book and the authors of this set of four articles are basically part of the same research group, the roles they have played differ considerably.The book was researched and written by four scholars living outside of China's mainland.The special issue of this journal, on the other hand, is mainly the work of four mainland-based academics.For reasons of background and proximity to the institutions being researched, the impressions and critiques of China's progress towards higher education "massification" by scholars from China's mainland as against overseas scholars are somewhat different.Actually this interaction between the two distinct groups of scholars was part of the project's original intention: a juxtaposition of "insider" and "outsider" viewpoints, which could provide a picture of China's move to mass higher education that is both objective and relatively complete.In fact, the authors of the book and the authors of the articles for this special issue are largely in agreement with regard to the factual analysis of change, while the authors from China's mainland have added some additional insights on the basis of the empirical findings of the case studies.Nevertheless the points of view of the two groups diverged somewhat in the way they interpreted the factual analysis and its theoretical implications.If the reader has a chance to read both the book and the articles in this special issue, an interesting comparison can be
What problem does this paper attempt to address?