Abstract:Objective To assess the efficacy of the prophylactic de-escalation use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation(NPPV) in improvement of oxygenation following extubation after stanford type A aortic dissection.Methods 40 patients recovering from the stanford type A aortic dissection operation in the Center for Cardiac Intensive Care,Beijing Anzhen Hospital between December 2015 and April 2016,and meet the inclusion criterion after extubation,were investigated.The patients were random divided into 2 groups with RandA1.0 software,each group contained 20 patients:NPPV with mask vs.traditional oxygen treatment with mask.NPPV initial 2 h(started from extubation) settings:inspiratory pressure(IPAP) of 14-16 cmH2 O,expiratory pressure (EPAP) of 6-8 cmH2 O,the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 0.35-0.55.2-8 h the parameters of setting were decreased:IPAP l0-12 cmH2 O,EPAP 4 cmH2 O.After 8 h the NPPV was finished and the oxygen treatment instead.The oxygen treatment settings:the flux inhalation of oxygen was 6-10 L/min,and FiO2 was adjusted to 0.35-0.55.Make a comparison with the two groups in the clinical effect at 2 h,8 h,24 h,3 days,and to compare their reintubation rate.Results PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 were higher in the prophylactic NPPV group compared to oxygen treatment group after 2 h [94.7(89.7,100.1) mmHg vs.84.5(78.7,87.1) mmHg,P ＜0.05.(192.7 ±31.2) mmHg vs.(167.0 ± 18.9) mmHg,P＜0.05],8 h[99.1(90.3,132.8) mmHgvs.86.3(82.3,95.6) mmHg,P＜0.05.198.2(180.5,246.2) mmHg vs.172.5(164.7,191.2) mmHg,P ＜0.05],24 h[(100.0 ± 18.9) mmHg vs.(87.3 ±12.9) mmHg,P＜ 0.05.(197.5±36.8) mmHgvs.(170.1 ±29.8) mmHg,P＜0.05] and3 days[98.2(87.4,110.5)mmHg vs.86.8 (79.4,89.6) mmHg,P ＜ 0.05.(193.2 ± 37.1) mmHg vs.(164.4 ± 23.8) mmHg,P ＜ 0.05],and respiratory rate was lower in the NPPV group at the same time.Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were lower in the NPPV group at 24 h and 3 days.At 3 days in the NPPV group PaCO2 was lower,and left ventricular ejection fraction was improved.But the treatment of traditional oxygen leaded to a higher incidence of pulmonary atelectasis,and more longer hospitalization time.Conclusion In the early stage after extubation,prophylactic de-escalation therapy of NPPV for patients following operation of stanford type A aortic dissection,may quickly improve PaO2/FiO2,and increase the function of heart,avoid atelectasis.Furthermore,hospital stay was eventually shortened in NPPV group.

Effect of Sequential Noninvasive Ventilation on Early Extubation after Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Aortic Outcome after Implementation of a Treatment Strategy for Type B Aortic Dissection Involving the Aortic Arch

Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients Undergoing Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery: A Six-Year Experience

Effects of prophylactic use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation following stanford type A aortic dissection operation

Perioperative risk factors for delayed extubation after acute type A aortic dissection surgery

A novel nomogram for predicting prolonged mechanical ventilation after acute type A aortic dissection surgery: a retrospective study investigating the impact of ventilation duration on postoperative outcomes

Early Prone Position Ventilation in the Efficacy for Severe Hypoxemia and Neurological Complications Following Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) Surgery

Postoperative Nursing Care of Obese Patients with Aortic Dissection Receiving Modified Prone Position Mechanical Ventilation: A Report of Two Cases

Short and midterm outcomes of surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection concomitant CABG vs. ECMO support: A retrospective study

Effectiveness of Adaptive Support Ventilation in Facilitating Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation in Postoperative Patients

Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Acute Type-A Aortic Dissection with Coronary Artery Involvement.

Application of Sequential Non-invasive Ventilation in Weaning Patients off Mechanical Ventilation after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Timing and Outcome of Endovascular Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection

Study on preoperative treatment of acute Type-A aortic dissection with endotracheal intubation combined with deep analgesia and sedation

Opportunity for NIPPV sequential therapy after extubation in patients with acute left heart failure complicated with respiratory failure

Effect of Different Types of Cerebral Perfusion for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Undergoing Aortic Arch Procedure, Unilateral Versus Bilateral

Initial Clinical Impact of Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy for Refractory Hypoxemia Following Type A Acute Aortic Dissection Surgery.

Effect of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) on Mortality of Total Arch Replacement in Subacute/chronic Type A Aortic Dissection

Mid-term Outcomes from a Multicenter Study: is TEVAR Safe for Ascending Aortic Dissection?

Compare the Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation and Tracheotomy in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Neurosurgical Patients: a Retrospective Observe Cohort Study

Application of prosthesis eversion method for ascending aorta replacement guarantees better clinical outcomes of type A acute aortic dissection surgery