Abstract:The concept of learning has multiple interpretations, ranging from acquiring knowledge or skills to constructing meaning and social development. Machine Learning (ML) is considered a branch of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and develops algorithms that can learn from data and generalize their judgment to new observations by exploiting primarily statistical methods. The new millennium has seen the proliferation of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), a formalism able to reach extraordinary achievements in complex problems such as computer vision and natural language recognition. In particular, designers claim that this formalism has a strong resemblance to the way the biological neurons operate. This work argues that although ML has a mathematical/statistical foundation, it cannot be strictly regarded as a science, at least from a methodological perspective. The main reason is that ML algorithms have notable prediction power although they cannot necessarily provide a causal explanation about the achieved predictions. For example, an ANN could be trained on a large dataset of consumer financial information to predict creditworthiness. The model takes into account various factors like income, credit history, debt, spending patterns, and more. It then outputs a credit score or a decision on credit approval. However, the complex and multi-layered nature of the neural network makes it almost impossible to understand which specific factors or combinations of factors the model is using to arrive at its decision. This lack of transparency can be problematic, especially if the model denies credit and the applicant wants to know the specific reasons for the denial. The model's "black box" nature means it cannot provide a clear explanation or breakdown of how it weighed the various factors in its decision-making process. Secondly, this work rejects the belief that a machine can simply learn from data, either in supervised or unsupervised mode, just by applying statistical methods. The process of learning is much more complex, as it requires the full comprehension of a learned ability or skill. In this sense, further ML advancements, such as reinforcement learning and imitation learning denote encouraging similarities to similar cognitive skills used in human learning.

On Presuppositions of Machine Learning: A Meta Theory

Information-Theoretic Foundations for Machine Learning

Toward a `Standard Model' of Machine Learning

Beneficial and Harmful Explanatory Machine Learning

Machine Learning and Theory Ladenness -- A Phenomenological Account

A General Theory for Training Learning Machine

Supervised machine learning for theory building and testing: Opportunities in operations management

Importance of the Mathematical Foundations of Machine Learning Methods for Scientific and Engineering Applications

What Machine Learning Tells Us About the Mathematical Structure of Concepts

A Theory of Machine Learning

Machine Learning and Computational Mathematics

Lost in Translation: Reimagining the Machine Learning Life Cycle in Education

Rethinking Machine Ethics -- Can LLMs Perform Moral Reasoning through the Lens of Moral Theories?

The Automated Laplacean Demon: How ML Challenges Our Views on Prediction and Explanation

Is machine learning good or bad for the natural sciences?

The Challenges of Machine Learning: A Critical Review

Towards Fair Machine Learning Software: Understanding and Addressing Model Bias Through Counterfactual Thinking

A Meta Understanding of Meta-Learning

An Introduction to Advanced Machine Learning : Meta Learning Algorithms, Applications and Promises

Deep Learning and Machine Learning -- Natural Language Processing: From Theory to Application

Interpretable machine learning: Fundamental principles and 10 grand challenges