Is Intravenous Access Necessary in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Ophthalmologic Examinations Under Anesthesia? A Prospective Observational Study
Darunee Sripadungkul,Raya Thanayongpibul,Cattleya Kasemsiri,Phanthipha Wongwai,Sutida Boonkamjad,Duangned Litu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s475544
2024-10-04
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Abstract:Darunee Sripadungkul, 1, &ast Raya Thanayongpibul, 1 Cattleya Kasemsiri, 1, &ast Phanthipha Wongwai, 2 Sutida Boonkamjad, 1 Duangned Litu 1 1 Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand; 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Cattleya Kasemsiri, Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand, Tel +66-081-5480283, Email Purpose: Ophthalmologic examinations under anesthesia (EUA) were employed in pediatric patients due to lower cooperation levels and associated discomfort during comprehensive eye examinations. There remains uncertainty regarding the necessity of intravenous (IV) placement during general anesthesia. The primary aim of the study is to investigate the impact of general anesthesia, with and without IV access, on operation time in pediatric patients undergoing EUA. Secondary objectives include assessing cardiovascular and respiratory complications and measuring parental satisfaction in both the IV and No IV groups. Patients and Methods: This prospective observational analytic study, conducted as a cross-sectional study, took place between October 2019 and October 2020, in Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. We included healthy pediatric patients aged 2 to 7 years undergoing elective ambulatory EUA. Results: Eighty-two patients, with 41 in the IV group and 41 in the No IV group, were enrolled and included for analysis. The No IV group showed a significantly shorter median operation time (7.99 (6.63, 9.36) minutes) compared to the IV group (10.9 (9.05, 12.28) minutes), with a median difference of − 2.74 minutes (95% CI − 3.76, − 1.69, p < 0.001). In both groups, no cardiovascular or respiratory complications occurred, and there was no need for emergency IV access or drug administration. Children without IV access had higher parental satisfaction in extreme satisfaction (100% vs 48.78%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Providing general anesthesia for EUA without IV access in healthy pediatric patients, leading to shorter operation times and heightened parental satisfaction, can be conducted safely. Clinical Trial Registration Number: The trial registration number is TCTR20191021001 from the Thai Clinical Trials Registry. Keywords: anesthesia, catheters, examinations, eye, operative, pediatrics, time Ophthalmologic examinations under anesthesia (EUA), which are brief procedures, were conducted in pediatric patients due to their lower levels of cooperation and the associated discomfort during comprehensive eye examinations, such as in cases of retinoblastoma. 1–3 Most ambulatory pediatric procedures use a spontaneous breathing inhalation technique. Intravenous (IV) access is established after achieving adequate anesthesia depth and airway management with a face mask or laryngeal mask airway (LMA). 1 The ongoing debate concerns whether IV access is necessary for general anesthesia in pediatric patients. 4 The benefit of IV access allows for perioperative fluid and drug administration, as well as blood component delivery, especially in emergency conditions such as laryngospasm, bronchospasm, anaphylaxis, arrhythmias, excessive blood loss, and other complications. 3,5 Alternative routes for emergency drug administration in situations lacking IV access include intramuscular (IM) and intraosseous (IO) options for managing these events. 4 It's worth noting that performing IV access in pediatric patients is not without risk, with difficulties arising from smaller veins, body habitus, and excessive subcutaneous fat. 3 Adverse events during IV access, such as discomfort, subcutaneous infiltration, infection, or potential parental dissatisfaction, may occur if multiple venipunctures are necessary. 5,6 Previous studies indicate that general anesthesia for minor procedures without IV access in pediatric patients during EUA, 3,7 myringotomy with tubes 8 or dental procedures 9 can be safely conducted with experienced assistance. 10 This approach not only reduces operation time, induction time, recovery time, and total hospital time but also enhances parental satisfaction. 5,8 Regarding pediatric patients undergoing EUA procedures, general anesthesia without IV access showed both absence of complications 7 and occurrence of minor complications, all resolving safely without long-term -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services