Abstract:As a new programming paradigm, deep learning (DL) has achieved impressive performance in areas such as image processing and speech recognition, and has expanded its application to solve many real-world problems. However, neural networks and DL are normally black-box systems; even worse, DL-based software are vulnerable to threats from abnormal examples, such as adversarial and backdoored examples constructed by attackers with malicious intentions as well as unintentionally mislabeled samples. Therefore, it is important and urgent to detect such abnormal examples. Although various detection approaches have been proposed respectively addressing some specific types of abnormal examples, they suffer from some limitations; until today, this problem is still of considerable interest. In this work, we first propose a novel characterization to distinguish abnormal examples from normal ones based on the observation that abnormal examples have significantly different (adversarial) robustness from normal ones. We systemically analyze those three different types of abnormal samples in terms of robustness and find that they have different characteristics from normal ones. As robustness measurement is computationally expensive and hence can be challenging to scale to large networks, we then propose to effectively and efficiently measure robustness of an input sample using the cost of adversarially attacking the input, which was originally proposed to test robustness of neural networks against adversarial examples. Next, we propose a novel detection method, named attack as detection (A 2 D for short), which uses the cost of adversarially attacking an input instead of robustness to check if it is abnormal. Our detection method is generic, and various adversarial attack methods could be leveraged. Extensive experiments show that A 2 D is more effective than recent promising approaches that were proposed to detect only one specific type of abnormal examples. We also thoroughly discuss possible adaptive attack methods to our adversarial example detection method and show that A 2 D is still effective in defending carefully designed adaptive adversarial attack methods—for example, the attack success rate drops to 0% on CIFAR10.

White-box Fairness Testing Through Adversarial Sampling

Black-Box Fairness Testing with Shadow Models.

Automatic Fairness Testing of Neural Classifiers through Adversarial Sampling

TESTSGD: Interpretable Testing of Neural Networks Against Subtle Group Discrimination.

Fairness Testing of Deep Image Classification with Adequacy Metrics

Attack As Detection: Using Adversarial Attack Methods to Detect Abnormal Examples.

NeuronFair: Interpretable White-Box Fairness Testing through Biased Neuron Identification

NeuronFair

RobustFair: Adversarial Evaluation through Fairness Confusion Directed Gradient Search

RULER: Discriminative and Iterative Adversarial Training for Deep Neural Network Fairness.

Black-box Adversarial Sample Generation Based on Differential Evolution

Adversarial Sampling for Fairness Testing in Deep Neural Network

FairQuant: Certifying and Quantifying Fairness of Deep Neural Networks

Fast & Fair: Efficient Second-Order Robust Optimization for Fairness in Machine Learning

General Adversarial Defense Against Black-box Attacks Via Pixel Level and Feature Level Distribution Alignments

Efficient DNN-Powered Software with Fair Sparse Models

Fairness Without Harm: An Influence-Guided Active Sampling Approach

NeuFair: Neural Network Fairness Repair with Dropout

Information-Theoretic Testing and Debugging of Fairness Defects in Deep Neural Networks

NATTACK: Learning the Distributions of Adversarial Examples for an Improved Black-Box Attack on Deep Neural Networks

FairSample: Training Fair and Accurate Graph Convolutional Neural Networks Efficiently