Abstract:Although nuclear power has gradually played an important role in world's energy consumption, there is still controversy because of the threat of releasing harmful radioactive substances. The public's incomplete understanding of nuclear power's risks and benefits has led to the Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY) effects all over the world, especially in developing countries. It is important to analyze the role that nuclear energy plays for human society in a multidimensional manner. Previous studies have investigated the benefits and risks of nuclear power, which mainly focus on economic benefits, and carbon or pollution emissions reduction benefits. Quantitative study on the comparison of health risks and benefits has been lacking. By taking China as an example, we compared the health risks and benefits of nuclear power using a health impact assessment methodology framework. The results show that, under normal operating conditions, the maximum annual disability adjusted life years (DALYs) caused by a single nuclear power plant would be 2.2 h and 11.4 h in 2020 and 2030, respectively. In 2030, the DALYs of the population exposed for 8 h within approximately 80 km of a plant would be between 108 and 9199 years in a severe accident scenario. The health benefits of nuclear power were calculated by avoided DALYs of reduced SO2, NOx, and PM10 of coal-fired power substituted by nuclear power. The avoided DALYs would be 501.0-1658.1 years and 676.4-2942.4 years in 2020 and 2030, respectively. Considering that risk equals consequence multiplied by the probability, developing nuclear power is risk-benefit feasible. More precise risk prevention, control measures and emergency plans (for both normal operation and accident conditions) of nuclear power plant should be put into place, and risk communication should be strengthened (e.g., bringing the scientific-based risk-benefit assessment results to the public, etc.) to reduce the public's NIMBY effects. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Study of Risk Acceptance of Nuclear Power

Public Acceptance Study of Nuclear Energy

Changes in the Public Acceptance of Nuclear Energy in Japan

The Study of Panic to Nuclear Energy on Psychological and Sociological Issues

Public Perceptions and Acceptance of Nuclear Energy in China: the Role of Public Knowledge, Perceived Benefit, Perceived Risk and Public Engagement

Perception of People for the Risk of Tianwan Nuclear Power Plant

Acceptance in progress: Navigating the transition of nuclear power perception from a long-term study in China

How would social acceptance affect nuclear power development? A study from China

Comparative Analysis on the Acceptances of Nuclear Technology Between Scientists and the Public：Based on the Case of Fukushima Nuclear Leak

Environmental Beliefs and Public Acceptance of Nuclear Energy in China: A Moderated Mediation Analysis

The changing risk perception towards nuclear power in China after the Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan

Examining the role of perceived risk and benefit, shared concern for nuclear stigmatization, and trust in governments in shaping citizen risk acceptability of a nuclear power plant

Effect Of The Fukushima Nuclear Accident On The Risk Perception Of Residents Near A Nuclear Power Plant In China

Public knowledge, perception of and willingness-to-accept nuclear energy in China: Evidence from a representative national survey

The Health Risk-Benefit Feasibility of Nuclear Power Development

Newspaper Coverage of Nuclear Power in China, from A Public Acceptance Perspective

A Structural Equation Model about Influencing Factors on Nuclear Acceptance

Crisis Communication about Nuclear Accidents with Psychological Approaches

Can Power Affect Environmental Risk Attitude Toward Nuclear Energy?

Establishing an Objective System for the Assessment of Public Acceptance of Nuclear Power in China

Public knowledge, sentiments, and perceptions of low dose radiation (LDR) and power production, with special reference to reactor accidents