Hemodynamic Parameters Comparison Between 4D Flow MRI and Computational Lfuid Dynamics for Intracranial Aneurysms

CHEN Yu,ZHANG Yu,ZHOU Ze-chen,LIU Ai-hua,LIU Peng,LI Rui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2016.08.011
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the results of 4D Flow MRI and computational lfuid dynamics (CFD).Materials and Methods:In this study, 4 patients with intracranial aneurysms (IA) were selected, all of whom underwent both 4D Flow MRI scan and CFD simulation. Two sets of velocity data were analyzed and compared. 3D pathlines were calculated and visualized based on velocity data. Mean velocity proifles at IAs’ neck contour were obtained and normalized root mean squared error(NRMSE) as well as R-squared(R2) value were calculated and compared. At last, velocity distribution on maximum cross section slice were demonstrated.Results:This study shows 3D pathlines of 4D Flow MRI and CFD look similar to each other. Average velocity on IA’s neck contour are consistent. NRMSE values are 0.08992(0.10208, 0.10270, 0.04242, 0.11248). R2 values are 0.95958(0.9735, 0.9316, 0.9920, 0.9412). In maximum cross setion of IA, velocity distributions demonstrate similar features in general.Conclusion:There exists a strong linear correlation between 4D Flow MRI measurement and CFD simulation, but also some disagreements in detail. It’s necessary to undertake in vitro phantom experiments to investigate in detail.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?