Title Characterization of high-temperature performance of cesium vapor cells with anti-relaxation coating Permalink

Wenhao Li,M. Balabas,Xiang Peng,S. Pustelny,A. Wickenbrock,Hong Guo,D. Budker

2016-01-01

Abstract:Vapor cells with antirelaxation coating are widely used in modern atomic physics experiments due to the coating’s ability to maintain the atoms’ spin polarization during wall collisions. We characterize the performance of vapor cells with different coating materials by measuring longitudinal spin relaxation and vapor density at temperatures up to 95◦C. We found that the spin-projection-noise-limited sensitivity for atomic magnetometers with such cells improves with temperature, which demonstrates the potential of antirelaxation coated cells in applications of future high-sensitivity magnetometers. © 2016 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (020.0020) Atomic and molecular physics; (120.0120) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology; (230.0230) Optical devices. References and links 1. D. Budker and M. Romalis, “Optical magnetometry,” Nat. Phys. 3, 227 (2007). 2. D. Budker, L. Hollberg, D. F. Kimball, J. Kitching, S. Pustelny, and V. Yashchuk, “Microwave transitions and nonlinear magneto-optical rotation in anti-relaxation-coated cells,” Phys. Rev. A 71, 012903 (2005). 3. B. Julsgaard, J. Sherson, J. I. Cirac, J. Fiurasek, and E. S. Polzik, “Experimental demonstration of quantum memory for light,” Nature 71, 482 (2004). 4. A. Kuzmich, L. Mandel, and N. P. Bigelow, “Generation of spin squeezing via continuous quantum nondemolition measurement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1594 (2000). 5. S. Pustelny, D. F. Jackson Kimball, C. Pankow, M. P. Ledbetter, P. Wlodarczyk, P. Wcislo, M. Pospelov, J. R. Smith, J. Read, W. Gawlik, and D. Budker, “The Global Network of Optical Magnetometers for Exotic physics (GNOME): A novel scheme to search for physics beyond the Standard Model,” Ann. Phys. 525, 659 (2013). 6. S. Pustelny, D. Jackson Kimball, S. Rochester, V. Yashchuk, and D. Budker, “Influence of magnetic-field inhomogeneity on nonlinear magneto-optical resonances,” Phys. Rev. A 74, 063406 (2006). 7. M. -A. Bouchiat and J. Brossel, “Relaxation of optically pumped Rb atoms on paraffin-coated palls,” Phys. Rev. 147, 41 (1966). 8. V. Liberman and R. J. Knize, “Relaxation of optically pumped Cs in wall-coated cells,” Phys. Rev. A 34, 5115 (1986). 9. M. Graf, D. Kimball, S. Rochester, K. Kerner, C. Wong, D. Budker, E. Alexandrov, M. Balabas, and V. Yashchuk, “Relaxation of atomic polarization in paraffin-coated cesium vapor cells,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 023401 (2005). 10. T. Karaulanov, M. Graf, D. English, S. Rochester, Y. Rosen, K. Tsigutkin, D. Budker, E. Alexandrov, M. V. Balabas, D. F. Kimball, F. Narducci, S. Pustelny, and V. Yashchuk, “Controlling atomic vapor density in paraffin-coated cells using light-induced atomic desorption,” Phys. Rev. A 79, 012902 (2009). 11. M. V. Balabas, K. Jensen, W. Wasilewski, H. Krauter, L.S. Madsen, J.H. Müller, T. Fernholz, and E.S. Polzik, “High quality anti-relaxation coating material for alkali atom vapor cells,” Opt. Express 18, 5825 (2010). 12. M. V. Balabas, “Dependence of the longitudinal relaxation time of the polarization of cesium atoms in the ground state on the temperature of an antirelaxation coating,” Tech. Phys. 55, 1324 (2010). 13. M. V. Balabas and O. Y. Tret’yak, “Temperature dependence of the kinetics of irreversible escape of cesium atoms from a vapor phase into an antirelaxation coating,” Tech. Phys. 57, 1257 (2012). 14. K. Nasyrov, S. Gozzini, A. Lucchesini, C. Marinelli, S. Gateva, S. Cartaleva, and L. Marmugi, “Antirelaxation coatings in coherent spectroscopy: Theoretical investigation and experimental test,” Phys. Rev. A 92, 043803 (2015). 15. S. J. Seltzer, D. J. Michalak, M. H. Donaldson, M. V. Balabas, S.K. Barber, S. L. Bernasek, M. -A. Bouchiat, A. Hexemer, A. M. Hibberd, D. F. Kimball, C. Jaye, T. Karaulanov, F. A. Narducci, S. A. Rangwala, H. G. Robinson, A. K. Shmakov, D.L. Voronov, V. V. Yashchuk, A. Pines, and D. Budker, “Investigation of antirelaxation coatings for alkali-metal vapor cells using surface science techniques,” J. Chem. Phys. 133, 144703 (2010). 16. M. V. Balabas, T. Karaulanov, M. P. Ledbetter, and D. Budker, “Polarized alkali-metal vapor with minute-long transverse spin-relaxation time,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 070801 (2010). 17. M. V. Balabas and O. Y. Tretiak, “Comparative study of alkali-vapour cells with alkane-, alkeneand 1-nonadecylbenzene-based antirelaxation wall coatings,” Quantum Electron. 43, 1175 (2013). 18. K. Jensen, R. Budvytyte, R. A. Thomas, T. Wang, A. Fuchs, M. V. Balabas, G. Vasilakis, L. Mosgaard, T. Heimburg, S. Olesen, and E.S. Polzik, “Non-invasive detection of animal nerve impulses with an atomic magnetometer operating near quantum limited sensitivity,” arXiv:1601.03273 (2016). 19. J. Kitching, S. Knappe, and L. Hollberg, “Miniature vapor-cell atomic-frequency references,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 553 (2002). 20. M. P. Ledbetter, I. M. Savukov, V. M. Acosta, D. Budker, and M. V. Romalis, “Spin-exchangerelaxation-free magnetometry with Cs vapor,” Phys. Rev. A 77, 1 (2008). 21. S. J. Seltzer and M. V. Romalis, “High-temperature alkali vapor cells with antirelaxation surface coatings,” J. Appl. Phys. 106, 114905 (2009). 22. C. Rahman and H. G. Robinson, “Rb O-O hyperfine transition in evacuated wall-coated cell at melting temperature,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23, 452 (1987). 23. J. Vanier, R. Kunski, A. Brisson, and P. Paulin, “Progress and prospects in rubidium frequency standards,” J. Phys. 42, 139 (1981). 24. D. Budker and D. F. Kimball, Optical Magnetometry (Cambridge University, 2013). 25. It is often the transverse spin relaxation time (T2) that appears in Eq. (1) to represent the spin relaxation time τrel. Since the transverse spin relaxation time is limited by the longitudinal spin relaxation time (T1) (T2 ≤ 2T1, which is the regime where atomic magnetometers are often operated), we use T1 to represent the spin-relaxation time τrel in Eq. (1) to study the fundamental limit to the magnetometric sensitivity. 26. W. Franzen, “Spin relaxation of optically aligned rubidium vapor,” Phys. Rev. 115, 850 (1959). 27. W. Chalupczak, P. Josephs-Franks, R. M. Godun, and S. Pustelny, “Radio-frequency spectroscopy in the dark,” Phys. Rev. A 88, 052508 (2013). 28. V. V. Yashchuk, D. Budker, and J. R. Davis, “Laser frequency stabilization using linear magnetooptics,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 341 (2000). 29. Even larger locking ranges may be achieved with DAVLLs operated at alleviated temperatures [35] or systems using buffer-gas cells [36]. 30. S. Rochester, AtomicDensityMatrix v15.08.27 (2015). 31. S. J. Seltzer, M. -A. Bouchiat, and M. V. Balabas, “Surface coatings for atomic magnetometry,” in Optical Magnetometry, D. Budker and D. F. Kimball, ed. (Cambridge University, 2013) Chap. 11, pp. 205–224. 32. N. Sekiguchi and A. Hatakeyama, “Non-negligible collisions of alkali atoms with background gas in buffer-gas-free cells coated with paraffin,” Appl. Phys. B 122, 81 (2016). 33. E. Zhivun, A. Wickenbrock, J. Sudyka, S. Pustelny, B. Patton, and D. Budker, “Light shift averaging in paraffin-coated alkali vapor cells,” arXiv:1511.05345 (2015). 34. N. Bhaskar, J. Pietras, J. Camparo, W. Happer, and J. Liran, “Spin destruction in collisions between cesium atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 930 (1980). 35. A. L. Marchant, S. Händel, T. P. Wiles, S. A. Hopkins, C. S. Adams, and S. L. Cornish, “Offresonance laser frequency stabilization using the Faraday effect,” Opt. Lett. 36, 64 (2011). 36. S. Pustelny, V. Schultze, T. Sholtes, and D. Budker, “Dichroic atomic vapor laser lock with multigigahertz stabilization range,” arXiv:1512.08919 (2015). 37. E. Zhivun, A. Wickenbrock, B. Patton, and D. Budker, “Alkali-vapor magnetic resonance driven by fictitious radiofrequency fields,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 192406 (2014).