Abstract:As a powerful tool for genome-wide gene expression analysis, DNA microarray technology is widely used in biomedical research. One important application of microarrays is to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between two distinct biological conditions, e.g. disease versus normal or treatment versus control, so that the underlying molecular mechanism differentiating the two conditions maybe revealed. Mechanistic interpretation of microarray results requires the identification of reproducible and reliable lists of DEGs, because irreproducible lists of DEGs may lead to different biological conclusions. Many vendors are providing microarray platforms of different characteristics for gene expression analysis, and the widely publicized apparent lack of intra- and cross-platform concordance in DEGs from microarray analysis of the same sets of study samples has been of great concerns to the scientific community and regulatory agencies like the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In this chapter, we describe the study design of and the main findings from the FDA-led MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project that aims to objectively assess the performance of different microarray platforms and the advantages and limitations of various competing statistical methods in identifying DEGs from microarray data. Using large data sets generated on two human reference RNA samples established by the MAQC project, we show that the levels of concordance in inter-laboratory and cross-platform comparisons are generally high. Furthermore, the levels of concordance largely depend on the statistical criteria used for ranking and selecting DEGs, irrespective of the chosen platforms or test sites. Importantly, a straightforward method combining fold-change ranking with a non-stringent P-value cutoff produces more reproducible lists of DEGs than those by t-test P-value ranking. Similar conclusions are reached when microarray data sets from a rat toxicogenomics study are analyzed. The availability of the MAQC reference RNA samples and the large reference data sets provides a unique resource for the gene expression community to reach consensus on the "best practices" for the generation, analysis, and applications of microarray data in drug development and personalized medicine.

Technical Issues Involved in Obtaining Reliable Data from Microarray Experiments

QA/QC: challenges and pitfalls facing the microarray community and regulatory agencies.

Microarray Technology: Unresolved Issues And Future Challenges From A Regulatory Perspective

QA/QC Issues to Aid Regulatory Acceptance of Microarray Gene Expression Data

Reproducible and Reliable Microarray Results Through Quality Control: Good Laboratory Proficiency and Appropriate Data Analysis Practices Are Essential

Approaches and Practical Considerations for the Analysis of Toxicogenomics Data

The Application of Novel Multifunctional Microarray Slides for Immobilization Biomolecules

Improvement in the Reproducibility and Accuracy of DNA Microarray Quantification by Optimizing Hybridization Conditions

Development of Public Toxicogenomics Software for Microarray Data Management and Analysis

The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements

The Microarray Quality Control (Maqc) Project And Cross-Platform Analysis Of Microarray Data

Cross-platform comparability of microarray technology: Intra-platform consistency and appropriate data analysis procedures are essential

Dna Microarrays: Applications, Future Trends, And The Need For Standardization

cDNA Microarray Experiment: Design Issues in Early Stage and the Need of Normalization

ArrayTrack: an FDA and Public Genomic Tool

ArrayTrack--supporting Toxicogenomic Research at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration National Center for Toxicological Research.

Microarray Platform Consistency is Revealed by Biologically Functional Analysis of Gene Expression Profiles

Challenges in applying microarrays to environmental studies.

Progress and promises in toxicogenomics in aquatic toxicology: Is technical innovation driving scientific innovation?

In Pursuit of Effective Toxicogenomics

Clinical Utility of Microarrays: Current Status, Existing Challenges and Future Outlook