Concurrent session 44: hla antibodies impact post transplantation

Yizhou Zou,Bhavna Lavingia,W Steves Ring,Clyde W Yancy,Peter Stastny,Dler Besarani,Jeanette Procter,Martin CM Barnardo,Lucia Cerundolo,John Smith,Philip McShane,Ian SD Roberts,Ashok Handa,Peter J Friend,Marlene L Rose,Susan V Fuggle
2006-01-01
Abstract:World Transplant Congress 2006 243 O R A L A B S T R A C T S clearly had DSA prior to discontinuing immunosuppression. Nine patients became sensitized following withdrawal of immunosuppression and therefore in these patients it is unlikely that alloantibody played a role in graft dysfunction. In one patient there are no samples to test whether the antibodies developed before the immunosuppression was withdrawn. Sixteen patients have been withdrawn from immunosuppression. 4 have been lost to follow up. Of the remaining 12, 8 have a Panel Reactive Antibody (PRA) >75% and 4 have a PRA >49<75%. Only one patient who has DSA but is still on immunosuppression has a PRA>50%. Appearance of DSA post transplant suggests underimmunosuppression and may impact late islet cell function. Exposure to multiple HLA mismatches at the time of islet cell transplant does not appear to impact early beta cell function. However it results in broad sensitization after withdrawal of immunosuppression. This will impact the ability to undergo future islet, pancreas or kidney transplantation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?