How Effective is the Minimum Living Standard Assistance Policy in Urban China?

Qin Gao
2007-01-01
Abstract:Since its inception more than a decade ago, the Minimum Living Standard Assistance (MLSA) has been serving as a last-resort for the urban poor. How effective has the MLSA been? Using newly available national household survey data, this paper provides updated evidence on the participation rate, delivery gap, and anti-poverty effectiveness of MLSA in urban China. It also explores the determinants of MLSA participation and receipt amount. We find that 2.28 percent of all urban residents are eligible for MLSA, but only slightly less than half of them are actual beneficiaries. MLSA eligible families tend to have less human capital and fewer socioeconomic resources than the ineligible ones. The MLSA benefits lower the poverty rates among the participants, but poverty remains a serious problem among the eligible families due to partial coverage and delivery. A simulation of full participation and delivery suggests that the anti-poverty effects of the MLSA can be much more prominent. More generous city MLSA assistance lines and higher entitled amounts both significantly predict higher participation rate and increased amount of benefits received. These results suggest that, despite some acclaimed progress, the overall effectiveness of the MLSA policy is under achieved and can be strengthened by full coverage and delivery of the benefits and by paying special attention to the more vulnerable subgroups.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?