Supplementary Information for Biocompatible and Totally-Disintegrable Semiconducting Polymer for Ultrathin and Ultra-Lightweight Transient Electronics

Ting Lei,Ming Guan,Jia Liu,Hung,Cheng Lin,Raphael Pfattner,Leo Shaw,Allister F. McGuire,Tsung,Ching Huang,Lei,Lai Shao,Kwang,Ting Cheng,Jeffrey B. Tok,Zhenan Bao
2017-01-01
Abstract:5,5'‐(2,5‐bis(2‐octyldodecyl)‐3,6‐dioxo‐2,3,5,6‐ tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4‐c]pyrrole‐1,4‐diyl)bis(thiophene‐2‐ carbaldehyde) (DPP‐CHO)2: To a 100 mL round bottom flask, diisopropylamine (0.98 mL, 6.96 mmol) and THF (50 mL) were added. n‐BuLi (1.6 M, 2.9 mL, 4.64 mmol) was added and stirred at 0 °C for 30 min to prepare fresh lithium diisopropyl‐ amide (LDA). Compound 1 (1.0 g, 1.16 mmol) in THF (20 mL) was then added dropwise into the lask at −78 °C. After stir‐ ring at −78 °C for 30 min, dry DMF (0.46 mL, 6.96 mmol) was added dropwise at −78 °C. The mixture was allowed to warm up to room temperature and stir for 1 h. Then the mixture was quenched with 20 mL of water. The aqueous layer was ex‐ tracted with dichloromethane (3 × 50 mL). The combined extracts were washed with distilled water and dried over an‐ hydrous Na2SO4. After removal of the solvents under reduced pressure, the residue was purified by chromatography with silica (eluent: hexane/ ethyl acetate = 20/1 to 10/1) to afford DPP‐CHO as a dark red solid. Yield: 0.82 g (77%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz, ppm): δ 10.03 (s, 2H), 9.04–9.02 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 2H), 7.88–7.86 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 2H), 4.05–4.03 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 4H), 1.89–1.86 (m, 2H), 1.45–1.18 (m, 64H), 0.94–0.81 (m, 12H). Polymerization for PDPP‐PD: To a Schlenk tube (100 mL), DPP‐CHO (250 mg, 0.273 mmol), p‐phenylenediamine (29.5 mg, 0.273 mmol), p‐toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA) (2.6 mg, 0.014 mmol, 5 mol%), anhydrous CaCl2 (100 mg, drying agent), and anhydrous toluene (30 mL) were added under nitrogen atmosphere. The tube was then sealed under a nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was stirred for 48 h at 110 °C. After completion, dry K2CO3 (10 mg) was added to neutralize the acid. The mixture was stirred at 110 °C for 30 min and then the filtered through a nylon filter to remove the drying agent and any insoluble salts. After removing the sol‐ vent in the filtrate, the polymers were purified via Soxhlet extraction for 2 h with dry acetone and 2 h with hexane, and was finally collected with chloroform. The chloroform fraction was then evaporated to remove the solvent and afford a dark green solid (213 mg, yield 79%). 1H NMR (C2D2Cl4, 400 MHz, 393 K, ppm): δ 10.07–10.05 (m, 2H), 8.95–8.67 (m, 3H), 7.89– 7.67 (m, 2H), 7.40 (m, 1H), 7.26–7.24 (m, 1H), 6.76–6.74 (m, 1H), 4.15–4.07 (m, 4H), 2.06–2.19 (m, 2H), 1.51–1.32 (m, 64H), 0.96–0.93 (m, 12H). Two conditions were used for preparing polymer PDPP‐PD: (1) with drying agent CaCl2. (2) without drying agent CaCl2. The first condition provides higher molecular weight of (Mw/Mn = 39.6 kDa /15.0 kDa, PDI = 2.64) Mw: 39,574 Da, PDI: 2.64; while the second conditions provides lower molecular weight (Mw/Mn = 19.1 kDa /7.7 kDa, PDI = 2.48).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?