Noise Performance of Magnitude-based Water-Fat Separation is Sensitive to the Echo Times

H. Yu,A. Shimakawa,D. Hernando,C. D. Hines,C. A. McKenzie,S. B. Reeder,J. H. Brittain
2010-01-01
Abstract:reconstruction in two patient scans at 1.5T. Patient A was acquired with slightly shorter TEs. The TEs from the patient B scan falls in the region with poor noise performance (Figure 1), leading to noisy and patchy artifact seen in both fat and fat-fraction images. The ROI measurements suggest similar mean fat-fraction in both patients. However, patient B is associated with substantially higher standard deviation. Figure 1: The NSA map for magnitude-based rreconstruction plotted against TE1 (first TE) and ΔTE. The magenta lines indicate the trajectory of minimum TEs when the read-out resolution of clinically relevant abdomen protocols ranges from 2mm to 1mm. Noise Performance of Magnitude-based Water-Fat Separation is Sensitive to the Echo Times
What problem does this paper attempt to address?