Interactive comment on “ C-Coupler 2 : a flexible and user-friendly community coupler for model coupling and nesting ”

Li Liu
2018-01-01
Abstract:2. page23, lines25-29. The ability to run with lags properly is critical. Lags almost always create additional requirements on restart ïňĄles and the ability to restart a model exactly (bit-for-bit) with lagged coupling ïňĄelds should be a requirement if lags are going to be supported. It sounds like this is not currently supported in C-Coupler2? Maybe rather than saying “We therefore propose”, it would be clearer to say something like “Lags are not fully supported in the current version, but in the future, the C-Coupler2 will ...”
What problem does this paper attempt to address?