Prevalence of BRCA 1 / 2 large genomic rearrangements in Chinese women with sporadic triple-negative or familial breast cancer Running title : BRCA 1 / 2 large genomic rearrangements in Chinese women with breast cancer

Liming Su,Juan Zhang,Hua Meng,Tao Ouyang,Jinfeng Li,Tianfeng,Wang,Zhaoqing Fan,Tie Fan,Benyao Lin,Yuntao Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.13256
2018-01-01
Abstract:The prevalence of BRCA1/2 large genomic rearrangements (LGRs) and their underlying mechanisms have not been fully evaluated in Chinese women with breast cancer. In this study, we determined the prevalence of BRCA1/2 LGRs in 834 patients with familial breast cancer and 660 patients with sporadic triple-negative breast cancer who were negative for BRCA1/2 small-range mutations using the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method. We found that twenty index patients (2.4%) in the familial breast cancer group carried a BRCA1 or BRCA2 LGR, and the frequencies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 LGRs were 1.6% and 0.8%, respectively. Seven index patients (1.1%) carried a BRCA1 LGR in 660 sporadic triple-negative breast cancer patients, whereas no BRCA2 LGRs were found in these patients. Among the BRCA1/2 LGRs, 48.1% (13/27) were novel, and the breakpoints of the majority of the LGRs were identified. ̈ BRCA1-mediated homologous recombination (HR) and Alu-mediated HR/non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) accounted for 40% and 30% of the BRCA1 LGRs, respectively. Alu-mediated HR accounted for 71.4% of the BRCA2 LGRs, and the remaining one-third was generated through LINE-mediated NHEJ. Our findings suggest that both familial breast cancer patients and sporadic triple-negative breast cancer patients should be tested for BRCA1/2 LGRs. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?