Abstract:Purpose: Monitoring tumor response during the course of treatment and adaptively modifying treatment plan based on tumor biological feedback may represent a new paradigm for radiotherapy. Diffusion MRI has shown great promises in assessing and predicting tumor response to radiotherapy. However, the conventional diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar-imaging (DW-ssEPI) technique suffers from limited resolution, severe distortion, and possibly inaccurate ADC at low field strength. The purpose of this work was to develop a reliable, accurate and distortion-free diffusion MRI technique that is practicable for longitudinal tumor response evaluation and adaptive radiotherapy on a 0.35 T MRI-guided radiotherapy system. Methods: A diffusion-prepared turbo spin echo readout (DP-TSE) sequence was developed and compared with the conventional diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar-imaging sequence on a 0.35 T MRI-guided radiotherapy system (ViewRay). A spatial integrity phantom was used to quantitate and compare the geometric accuracy of the two diffusion sequences for three orthogonal orientations. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) accuracy was evaluated on a diffusion phantom under both 0 degrees C and room temperature to cover a diffusivity range between 0.40 x 10(-3) and 2.10 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. Ten room temperature measurements repeated on five different days were conducted to assess the ADC reproducibility of DP-TSE. Two glioblastoma (GBM) and six sarcoma patients were included to examine the in vivo feasibility. The target registration error (TRE) was calculated to quantitate the geometric accuracy where structural CT or MR images were co-registered to the diffusion images as references. ADC maps from DP-TSE and DW-ssEPI were calculated and compared. A tube phantom was placed next to patients not treated on ViewRay, and ADCs of this reference tube were also compared. Results: The proposed DP-TSE passed the spatial integrity test (< 1 mm within 100 mm radius and < 2 mm within 175 mm radius) under the three orthogonal orientations. The detected errors were 0.474 0.355 mm, 0.475 +/- 0.287 mm, and 0.546 +/- 0.336 mm in the axial, coronal, and sagittal plane. DW-ssEPI, however, failed the tests due to severe distortion and low signal intensity. Noise correction must be performed for the DW-ssEPI to avoid ADC quantitation errors, whereas it is optional for DP-TSE. At 0 degrees C, the two sequences provided accurate quantitation with < 3% variation with the reference. In the room temperature study, discrepancies between ADCs from DP-TSE and the reference were within 4%, but could be as high as 8% for DW-ssEPI after the noise correction. Excellent ADC reproducibility with a coefficient of variation < 5% was observed among the 10 measurements of DP-TSE, indicating desirable robustness for ADC-based tumor response assessment. In vivo TRE in DP-TSE was less than 1.6 mm overall, whereas it could be greater than 12 mm in DW-ssEPI. For GBM patients, the CSF and brain tissue ADCs from DP-TSE were within the ranges found in literature. ADC differences between the two techniques were within 8% among the six sarcoma patients. For the reference tube that had a relatively low diffusivity, the two diffusion sequences provided matched measurements. Conclusion: A diffusion technique with excellent geometric fidelity, accurate, and reproducible ADC measurement was demonstrated for longitudinal tumor response assessment using a low-field MRI-guided radiotherapy system. (C) 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Effects of in vivo Flip Angle Variations on the Accuracy of DCE-MRI Perfusion Parameters at 1 . 5 T and 3 . 0 T

Variations of quantitative perfusion measurement on dynamic contrast enhanced CT for colorectal cancer: implication of standardized image protocol.

Effects of Flip Angle Uncertainty and Noise on the Accuracy of Dce-Mri Metrics: Comparison Between Standard Concentration-Based and Signal Difference Methods

Controlling T 2 blurring in 3D RARE arterial spin labeling acquisition through optimal combination of variable flip angles and k-space filtering.

Comparison of the Signal Difference Methodology with the Conventional Technique for DCE-MRI Perfusion Parameter Accuracy in the Presence of Flip Angle Deviations

3D Isotropic Resolution Diffusion-Prepared Magnitude-Stabilized Bssfp Imaging with High Geometric Fidelity at 1.5 Tesla

Motion-compensated 3D Turbo Spin-Echo for More Robust MR Intracranial Vessel Wall Imaging.

Assessing the Impact of Flip Angle and on Image Quality and reliability of Ernst Angle optimization across Varied Conditions in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Distortion-Free Diffusion MRI using an MRI-Guided Tri-Cobalt 60 Radiotherapy System: Sequence Verification and Preliminary Clinical Experience.

A cross-sectional study to test equivalence of low- versus intermediate-flip angle dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI measures of relative cerebral blood volume in patients with high-grade gliomas at 1.5 Tesla field strength

Evaluation of Performance Tradeoffs when Using Mechanically Swept 1-D Linear Arrays for 3-D DCE-US

Effect of parallel radiofrequency transmission on arterial input function selection in dynamic contrast‐enhanced 3 Tesla pelvic MRI

Feasibility study of exploring a T₁-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MR approach for brain perfusion imaging.

Factors Affecting Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging on 1.5T Clinical MRI Scanners

Quantitative Accuracy of Temporally Constrained Reconstruction in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI

SU-D-303-02: Impact of Arterial Input Function Selection and T10 Correction On DCE-MRI Tumour Response Prediction Using Compared to Volumetric DCE CT

Exploring the need for a preload on the estimation of permeability, vessel radius, and relative cerebral blood volume in MR vascular fingerprinting–based dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging

Comparative Analysis of Arterial Spin Labeling and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion Imaging for Quantitative Perfusion Measurements of Brain Tumors

Analysis of the main factors affecting quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging

Practical considerations in T1 mapping of prostate for dynamic contrast enhancement pharmacokinetic analyses

Improved Accuracy in T 1 mapping and Flip Angle Correction with Random Spoiling in Radial Gradient Echo Imaging