Abstract:Delivery by Kielland’s forceps has largely been abandoned by the current generation of obstetricians. The suggestion to consign the instrument to the obstetric museum was first made in the 1980s – , and the final death knell was sounded by the studies comparing it unfavourably with the ventouse – . In many hospitals in the UK, Kielland’s forceps are no longer available, and a whole generation of practising obstetricians are incapable of using them safely. Surveys in the UK and the USA suggest that vacuum extraction is more popular – . It is, therefore, almost inevitable that the use of Kielland’s forceps will decline, unless the experience of senior obstetricians is imparted to those in training. Within decades a superbly designed instrument, ideal for treating malposition of the fetal head, will be lost to our profession. In 1915, Christian Kielland (1871–1941) first described his forceps to achieve delivery from the mid-pelvis in cases of malrotation (occipito-posterior and occipito-transverse positions of the fetal head). Kielland (sometimes spelt Kjelland) originally recommended his forceps to be applied to the fetal head arrested in a high transerve or occipitoposterior position. He suggested that the anterior blade was first inserted by passing it in front of the baby’s head with the concavity of its cephalic curve facing the pubic bone. In this position the blade was then passed high into the uterus until the tip was seen to ‘tent up’ the anterior abdominal wall. The blade was then rotated through 180 and then drawn downwards until it fitted against the side of the fetal head. The posterior blade was then inserted directly into the hollow of the sacrum. The two blades were then locked, traction being made in a posterior direction, with a rotational force being added between contractions to bring the occiput to an anterior position. The original Kielland manoeuvre was associated with trauma, including uterine rupture, and therefore fell into disrepute. When caesarean section came to be regarded as a safe procedure the use of forceps for the delivery of the unengaged head was no longer justified. However, Kielland’s forceps were widely used in cases of malrotation with the fetal head in the midcavity of the pelvis. The mode of application of the forceps was more conventional by today’s standards. Where possible, the forceps were applied directly. Therefore in a direct occipito-posterior position each forceps blade would be passed directly into the sacral hollow in turn, and slid into position alongside the fetal head. In the case of an occipito-transverse position, the anterior blade would be slid over the fetal head first, followed by the posterior blade into the hollow of the sacrum. Occasionally, the ‘wandering’ application would be used, where the anterior blade was inserted posteriorly into the hollow of the sacrum, and then rotated to the correct position over the anterior side of the fetal head. The posterior blade was applied directly. Rotation was then effected, followed by delivery with traction. In any instrumental delivery adequate analgesia is essential, and in more recent years this has meant regional analgesia. Kielland’s forceps are superbly designed for delivery in the case of malposition. The forceps are light, and easy to manoeuvre. Various modifications of Kielland’s forceps (e.g. Moolgaoker’s forceps) are cumbersome, heavy and complicated. The absence of a pelvic curve makes the instrument ideally suited for rotation, and sliding lock allows asynclitism to be corrected easily. Correction of the position of the fetal head is achieved by a rotational force on the forceps. The sensation when the head reaches the occipito-anterior position is characteristic. Delivery is effected by traction on the forceps. The forceps are ideally suited for rotation, more than any other instrument. The ventouse has largely superseded rotational forceps. Although ease of use (that is, less skill is required) of the ventouse may partly explain this trend, the general conclusions of systematic reviews suggest an advantage for the ventouse, a reduction in maternal trauma and anal sphincter injuries – . The differences are not great, and are not significant at long term follow up. What is apparent from the systematic reviews is that forceps are more effective in achieving vaginal delivery. In experienced hands, it is a safe and effective instrument. The studies undertaken comparing the ventouse and ‘forceps’ are confusing and inconsistent with regard to the use of Kielland’s forceps. The randomised trials comparing the ventouse with forceps tend to group ‘rotational’ and ‘nonrotational’ deliveries together, and therefore it is impossible to draw any conclusions about the safety and complications of Kielland’s forceps. Because of the decline in Kielland’s forceps, randomised trials comparing the two methods of delivery in cases of malposition would be

Development and relative fitness of Cry 1 C resistance in Chilo suppressalis For submission to Pest Management Science

Effectiveness in the Field of Bt Rice Lines Against Target Pests under Various Cultural Regimes

CrylAb Rice Does Not Impact Biological Characters and Functional Response of Cyrtorhinus Lividipennis Preying on Nilaparvata Lugens Eggs

Characterization of Transgenic Rice Expressing Fusion Protein Cry1Ab/Vip3A for Insect Resistance

Using Field-Evolved Resistance to Cry1F Maize in a Lepidopteran Pest to Demonstrate No Adverse Effects of Cry1F on One of Its Major Predators

Bt Crops Producing Cry1Ac, Cry2Ab and Cry1F Do Not Harm the Green Lacewing, Chrysoperla Rufilabris

Assessing the effects of Cry1C rice and Cry2A rice to Pseudogonatopus flavifemur , a parasitoid of rice planthoppers

Using Resistant Prey Demonstrates That Bt Plants Producing Cry1Ac, Cry2Ab, and Cry1F Have No Negative Effects on Geocoris Punctipes and Orius Insidiosus.

Expression of Cry1Ab protein in a marker-free transgenic Bt rice line and its efficacy in controlling a target pest, Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)

Eliminating host-mediated effects demonstrates Bt maize producing Cry1F has no adverse effects on the parasitoid Cotesia marginiventris

Dynamic regulation of mouse ovarian stanniocalcin expression during gestation and lactation.

Multi-generation effect of Bt rice with cry1C and cry2A on survival, development and reproduction of non-target pest Sogatella furcifera (Horváth)

Cry2ab Tolerance Response Of Helicoverpa Armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Populations From Cry1ac Cotton Planting Region

Transgenic Rice Expressing a Fusion Protein of Cry1Ab and Cry9Aa Confers Resistance to a Broad Spectrum of Lepidopteran Pests

Knockdown of two Cadherin genes confers resistance to Cry2A and Cry1C in Chilo suppressalis

Transgenic Rice Plants Expressing a Modified Cry1ca1 Gene Are Resistant to Spodoptera Litura and Chilosuppressalis

Vip3Aa Tolerance Response of Helicoverpa Armigera Populations from a Cry1Ac Cotton Planting Region

In praise of Kielland's forceps

Transgenic cotton co-expressing chimeric Vip3AcAa and Cry1Ac confers effective protection against Cry1Ac-resistant cotton bollworm

Susceptibility of rice lepidopterans to four insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis

Mechanisms for multiple resistances in field populations of rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) from Sichuan Province, China